Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHIVAJI GANPATI JADHAV - ALUGADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the bail application and disposed of it as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Shivaji Ganpati Jadhav‑Alugade, filed an application for absolute bail in a case registered under Sections 3 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 37(1)(3) and 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act. After the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Shrikant Jadhav, sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The State's counsel, Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court, after considering the request, granted leave to withdraw the bail application. Consequently, Bail Application No. 720 of 2026 was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • What procedural requirements must be satisfied for a bail application to be withdrawn after filing?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • Arms Act
  • Maharashtra Police Act
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                             903-BA-720-2026.doc



         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                  BAIL APPLICATION NO. 720 OF 2026
Shivaji Ganpati Jadhav -Alugade                            … Applicant
     Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Anr.           … Respondents
__________________________________________________________
Mr. Shrikant Jadhav, for the Applicant.
Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, APP for the Respondent – State.
__________________________________________________________

                                 CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
                                  DATE : 18th August, 2026.
P.C. :


1.       Heard Mr. Shrikant Jadhav, learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, learned APP for the

Respondent – State.



2.       By the present Application, the Applicant has sought for

following substantive relief in terms of prayer clause (a):-


           (a)       The Hon’ble Court may kindly allow the
           application and enlarge the applicant/accused on absolute
           bail in connection with C.R. No. 220/2025 registered with
           Kurlap Police Station, under the offences punishable
           U/Sec. 3 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 and U/Sec. 37(1)
           (3) and 135 of The Maharashtra Police Act.




Arjun                              1
                                                                             903-BA-720-2026.doc



                     3.      After having heard the matter for some time, Mr. Shrikant

                     Jadhav, learned Advocate for the Applicant on instructions from

                     the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw the present Bail Application.



                     4.      Ms.   Mahalakshmi       Ganapathy,   learned   APP    for      the

                     Respondent – State, does not oppose the request made by Mr.

                     Shrikant Jadhav, learned Advocate for the Applicant.



                     5.      In view of the statement made by Mr. Shrikant Jadhav,

                     learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw

                     the present Bail Application.



                     6.      Criminal Bail Application No. 720 of 2026 is disposed of as

                     withdrawn.



                                                                  (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)




        Digitally
        signed by
        ARJUN
ARJUN   KRISHNA
KRISHNA RODGE
RODGE   Date:
        2026.08.21
        10:57:36
        +0530




                     Arjun                            2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.