Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRABHU PARSAPPA TALGADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the applicant, holding that the evidence did not warrant continued detention.

Summary

The applicant, accused No.3 in a murder case (Crime No. 352 of 2025), sought regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023. The prosecution’s case relied on circumstantial evidence, chiefly the recovery of a knife from the applicant at a location about 100 metres from the victim’s body, though the knife showed no blood stains. The trial court had denied bail, but the appellate bench examined whether the material on record sufficiently linked the applicant to the offence. Finding that the knife was recovered from a public area and that no other incriminating evidence existed against the applicant, the court held that continued detention was unwarranted. Consequently, the bail application was allowed subject to stringent conditions, including a monetary bond, restrictions on entering the police jurisdiction, and obligations to appear before the trial court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 despite the recovery of a knife from his possession.
  • Whether the circumstantial evidence presented is sufficient to justify denial of bail and continued detention.
  • What conditions may be imposed on the grant of bail in this case.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • circumstantial evidence
  • Section 483 BNSS
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • bail conditions
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                                                29 - BA - 725 - 2026.doc


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

VAIBHAV
RAMESH
JADHAV
Digitally signed by
VAIBHAV RAMESH
JADHAV
                                    CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 725 OF 2026
Date: 2026.09.16
18:48:36 +0530




                      Prabhu Parsappa Talgade                           … Applicant
                                   Versus.
                      The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                   … Respondents

                                                        -------
                      Ms. Pallavi Kante for the Applicant.
                      Ms. Mahalaxmi Ganapathy, APP for the State.
                      Mr. Amole Patil for Respondent No.3.
                      M. T. Kamble, Head Constable, Kavthemahankal Police
                      Station, is present.
                                                       -------
                                                      CORAM       : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

                                                      DATED       : SEPTEMBER 15, 2026
                      P.C.:-


                      1.       Heard Ms. Pallavi Kante, learned Advocate for the Applicant, Mr.

                      Amole Patil, learned Advocate for Respondent No.3, and Ms. Mahalaxmi

                      Ganapathy, APP for the State.


                      2.       By this Application, the Applicant seeks regular bail under Section

                      483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Crime No. 352 of 2025

                      registered at the Kavathe-Mahankal Police Station for offences

                      punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2) read with Section 3(5) of the

                      Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.




                      VRJ                                                                             1
                                                       29 - BA - 725 - 2026.doc


3.    Ms. Pallavi Kante, learned Advocate for the Applicant, states that

there are three (3) accused in Crime No. 352 of 2025. The Applicant is

Accused No. 3. She states that Crime No. 352 of 2025 is registered as

Sessions Case No. 246 of 2025 and is pending before the Additional

Sessions Judge, Sangli (“Trial Court”).


4.    The prosecution case is that the Informant (mother of Sunil-

deceased) lodged a complaint stating that a friend of the deceased had

come to meet the deceased and they had gone out. On 8 th September

2025 at about 9:30 a.m., the Informant's sister-in-law informed her that

the deceased was spotted lying injured in an agricultural field beside

Tisangi Ghatnandre Road, with injuries caused by a weapon and stones.


5.    The Applicant was arrested on 13th September 2025. The Bail

Application filed by the Applicant at Exhibit-5 in Sessions Case No. 246

of 2025 was rejected by the Trial Court on 18th April 2026.


6.    Ms. Pallavi Kante, learned Advocate for the Applicant, submits

that there is no material on record indicating the Applicant's

involvement in the crime. However, she submits that a knife alleged to

have been used in the offence is shown to have been recovered from the

Applicant. She submits that the knife was recovered from the Applicant

at a distance of nearly 100 meters from where the deceased's body was

found. She submits that the place from which the knife was recovered




VRJ                                                                          2
                                                        29 - BA - 725 - 2026.doc


from the Applicant was easily accessible to the public. She therefore

requests bail.


7.    Ms. Mahalaxmi Ganapathy, learned APP for the State, submits

that the Applicant's involvement in the crime is evident from the

recovery of the knife at his instance.


8.    Mr. Amole Patil, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 3, submits

that the Applicant is involved in the crime, as evidenced by the recovery

of the knife from him.


9.    Perused the record.


10.   The prosecution case is based on circumstantial evidence. The

Applicant was arrested on 13th           September 2025. The Section 27

panchanama is dated 16th September 2023. Perusal of the panchanama

indicates that the knife was recovered at the Applicant's instance from

nearly 100 meters away from the place where the deceased (Sunil) was

found. Prima facie, Ms. Pallavi Kante, learned Advocate for the

Applicant, would be justified in submitting that the place from which

the knife was recovered appears to be accessible to the public. Further,

the panchanama does not indicate any blood stains on the said knife.

Apart from the recovery of the knife, there is no material against the

Applicant.




VRJ                                                                           3
                                                        29 - BA - 725 - 2026.doc


11.   In view of the above, the Applicant's continued detention pending

trial in Sessions Case No. 246 of 2025 is not warranted.


12.   At this stage, Ms. Mahalaxmi Ganapathy, learned APP for the

State, submits that, in addition to stringent conditions, one of the

conditions that may be imposed on the Applicant is that the Applicant

shall not enter the jurisdiction of the Kavathe-Mahankal Police Station

pending the conclusion of the trial in Sessions Case No. 246 of 2025.


13.   Ms. Pallavi Kante, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on

instructions from the Applicant, states that until the conclusion of the

trial in Sessions Case No. 246 of 2025, the Applicant shall not enter the

jurisdiction of the Kavathe-Mahankal Police Station, Sangli. The

statement is accepted.


14.   In view of the above, this Application is allowed on the following

terms and conditions:


      (a)   The Applicant shall be released on bail in Crime No. 352 of

      2025 registered at Kavathe-Mahankal Police Station, upon

      furnishing a PR bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand

      only) with one or two sureties in the like amount, to the

      satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli in Sessions

      Case No. 246 of 2025.




VRJ                                                                           4
                                                         29 - BA - 725 - 2026.doc


      (b)   The Applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any

      inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the

      facts of the case to dissuade that person from disclosing the facts

      to the Court or any police officer. Applicant shall not tamper with

      evidence in any manner.


      (c)   The Applicant shall within (3) days of his release provide

      the Investigating Officer at Kavathe-Mahankal Police Station, with

      his residential address and proof thereof, his contact number and

      must inform the Investigating Officer, of any changes to this

      information from time to time.


      (d)   The Applicant shall regularly appear before the Additional

      Sessions Judge Sangli, in Sessions Case No. 246 of 2025,

      whenever the matter is fixed, unless specifically exempted. If the

      Applicant fails to appear before the Trial Court on the fixed date,

      it will be considered a breach of condition and the Trial Court,

      will be at liberty to pass appropriate orders.


      (e)   Till the conclusion of trial, the applicant shall not enter the

      territorial jurisdiction of Kavathe Mahankal Police Station.


      (f)   The Applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity

      during the pendency of the trial. If the Applicant is found involved




VRJ                                                                            5
                                                          29 - BA - 725 - 2026.doc


      in any criminal activity during the pendency of the trial in

      Sessions Case No. 246 of 2025, the prosecution shall be at liberty

      to apply for cancellation of bail before the trial Court.


15.   The observations made in this order are for deciding the Bail

Application and will not affect the trial.


16.   Criminal Bail Application No. 725 of 2026 is disposed of.




                                             (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)




VRJ                                                                             6


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.