Bombay High Court
PRADIP DATTATRAY MULIKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The Court allowed the withdrawal of the bail application and granted liberty to file a fresh bail application if needed.
Summary
The applicant, Pradip Dattatray Mulik, filed a bail application seeking release on bail for offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. His counsel, Mr. Aditya Raktade, requested permission to withdraw the application and to file a fresh bail application before the trial court if circumstances changed. The State's counsel did not oppose the request. The Court, after hearing, granted leave to withdraw the bail application, allowing the applicant to file a fresh application later, and disposed of the present application as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a bail application may be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application on change of circumstances
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 109, 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 189(1), 189(2), 190, 332(c)
Subjects
- bail
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- change in circumstances
Judgment
40-BA-790-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 790 OF 2026
Pradip Dattatray Mulik … Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Anr. … Respondents
__________________________________________________________
Mr. Aditya Raktade, for the Applicant.
Dr. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the Respondent – State.
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE : 24th August, 2026.
P.C. :
1. By the present Application, the Applicant has sought for the
following substantive relief in terms of prayer clause (b) :-
(b) Release the Applicant on bail in connection with
C.R.No. 210/2026 registered with Karvir Police Station &
Chargesheet No. 249 of 2026. for offences under Sections
109, 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 189(1), 189(2), 190, 332(c)
of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. After having heard the matter for some time, Mr. Aditya
Raktade, learned Advocate for the Applicant sought a passover to
take instructions from the Applicant. After some time, at his
request, this Application was taken up.
3. Mr. Aditya Raktade, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on
Arjun 1
40-BA-790-2026.doc
instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the
present Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application
before the Trial Court in the event of change in circumstances.
4. The request made by Mr. Aditya Raktade, learned Advocate
for the Applicant, is not opposed by Dr. A. A. Takalkar, learned APP
for the Respondent – State.
5. In view of the statement made by Mr. Aditya Raktade,
learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw
the present Bail Application with liberty as prayed.
6. If a fresh Bail Application is filed before the Trial Court on
the ground of change in circumstances, same be considered on its
own merits and in accordance with law.
7. Criminal Bail Application No. 789 of 2026, is disposed of as
withdrawn.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
Digitally
signed by
ARJUN
ARJUN KRISHNA
KRISHNA RODGE
RODGE Date:
2026.08.31 Arjun 2
11:00:31
+0530
Checking your session…