Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KRUSHNA PUNDLIK SANGLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The bail application is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh bail application after charge framing, and the applicant may renew the request if charges are not framed within six months.

Summary

The applicant, Krushna Pundlik Sangle, filed a bail application before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The Court indicated a disinclination to grant bail. The applicant's counsel then sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh bail application after the trial court frames charges. The Court granted this permission, ordering the bail application to be disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty sought. Additionally, the Court directed that if charges are not framed within six months, the applicant may renew his bail request.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedural step when the Court is disinclined to grant bail?
  • Can the applicant be permitted to withdraw the bail application and refile after charge framing?
  • Is the applicant entitled to a further opportunity to seek bail if charges are not framed within six months?

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal
  • charge framing
  • liberty to reapply
  • high court order

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:36900


                                                                       987(A)-BA-827-2026.odt




                       (This order is corrected as per order dated 18.08.2026)
                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                              987 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 827 OF 2026
                                    KRUSHNA PUNDLIK SANGLE
                                                VERSUS
                                  THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                                                   .…
                 Mr. Ishwar Kalyan Wagh, Advocate for Applicant
                 Mr. V. S. Badakh, APP for Respondent – State
                 Mr. S. B. Bhapkal h/f Mr. P. K. Joshi, Advocate for Assist to P. P.
                                                   .…

                                     CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.

                                        DATE : July 10, 2026
                 PER COURT :-
                 1.           When this Court shown disinclination to grant relief,

                 learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw

                 the application with liberty to file fresh bail application before the

                 trial Court after framing of charge.

                 2.           Permission granted. Bail application is disposed off as

                 withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

                 3.           If the charge is not framed within six months,

                 applicant is at liberty to renew his request.


                                                        [ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ]
                 SMS


                                                                                       1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.