Bombay High Court
DHANANJAY ALIAS DHANU VEDANT DOIJADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- Withdrawn
Holding
The bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Dhananjay alias DhanU Vedant Doijad, filed a bail application (No. 930 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, on the ground of undue delay in the trial. The Court directed the applicant's counsel to obtain a schedule for concluding the trial, which was later provided as a six‑month timeframe. Relying on this schedule, the applicant's advocate sought leave to withdraw the bail application. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedure for withdrawing a bail application after a trial schedule has been obtained?
Subjects
- bail
- trial delay
- withdrawal of application
- criminal procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42833
-1-
47-BA-930-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 930 OF 2026
DHANANJAY ALIAS DHANU VEDANT DOIJAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
.....
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Rohit Patwardhsn h/f. Mr. Satej Jadhav
APP for Respondent - State : Mr. D. J. Patil
.....
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
DATED : 15th SEPTEMBER 2026
PER COURT :
1. Present application is filed mainly on the ground of
delay in conducting and concluding the trial. On the last date, the
learned APP was directed to take instructions from his counterpart
as to what is the schedule and the time frame within which the
trial will be concluded. Today the learned APP submits that, he has
instructions that the trial will be concluded within a period of six
months from today. Statement is accepted.
2. The learned Advocate for the applicant, on the basis of
the statement made by the APP, seeks leave to withdraw the
present application. Leave as prayed is granted.
3. Bail Application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR)
JUDGE
Tandale
Checking your session…