Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

M/S TRYMENS PROPERTIES THRU. PROPRIETOR DEEPAK HARIDAS JADHAVversusROHIDAS SAHEBRAO TAJANPURE AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The appeal is allowed and must be decided within six months, subject to any higher‑court‑ordered priorities.

Summary

The petitioners Rohidas Sahebrao Tajanpure and another filed an appeal against Order No. 19 of 2026 passed in Civil Applications No. 10016 and 2192 of 2026 filed by the respondents M/s Trymens Properties. The appeal sought a direction that the pending Regular Civil Appeal No. 166/2024 be decided expeditiously. Both parties presented their submissions before the Bench of Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh. The Court considered the need for speedy disposal of pending civil matters and the hierarchy of cases that may be expedited by higher courts. It held that the prayer to have the appeal decided within six months should be granted, subject to any other matters that the Supreme Court or this Court may prioritize. Consequently, the appeal was allowed and the matter was ordered to be decided within six months, with all pending civil applications also disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appeal should be directed to be decided expeditiously within a specified time frame

Subjects

  • civil appeal
  • expedited disposal
  • procedure
  • court order

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42895



                                                  (1)                110 ao 19.26

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             110 APEAL FROM ORDER NO. 19 OF 2026
                            with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10016 OF 2026
                            with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2192 OF 2026

                         ROHIDAS SAHEBRAO TAJANPURE AND ANOTHER
                                          VERSUS
                                  M/S TRYMENS PROPERTIES
                          THRU. PROPRIETOR DEEPAK HARIDAS JADHAV

                                                  …..
                Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Tushar Shinde h/f. Chandrakant K. Shinde
                   Advocate for Respondents: Mr. Aditya Lokhande h/f. S.S. Tope
                                                  …..

                                           CORAM :      SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
                                           DATE :       21.09.2026

           P.C.:-

           1.           In view of the submissions made by both the sides, the appeal is

           disposed of. The prayer to decide Regular Civil Appeal No. 166/2024 is hereby

           allowed, and the same shall be decided as expeditiously as possible, and in

           any case, within six months from today. However, it is clarified that if any

           other appeals or matters are expedited by the Hon’ble Supreme Court or this

           Court, those shall be decided first.


           2.           The appeal is accordingly disposed of. Pending civil applications,

           if any, are also disposed of.


                                                           [SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.]
           mubashir


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.