Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MINAKSHI RAMKRUSHNA BHOJNEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petitioner is at liberty to amend the writ petition to place the document on record, subject to a two‑week filing period and service on the respondents.

Summary

The petitioner, Minakshi Ramkrushna Bhojne, filed a civil application seeking permission to amend her writ petition to place a document on record. The High Court examined whether such amendment was permissible under procedural law. The Court held that the petitioner may amend the writ petition, provided the amendment is filed within two weeks and the amended copy is served on the respondents. The respondents were also directed to file an affidavit‑in‑reply to the amended petition if they wish. Consequently, the civil application was disposed after granting the amendment and outlining the procedural steps.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to amend the writ petition to place a document on record

Subjects

  • amendment
  • writ petition
  • civil application
  • procedural law
  • High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42177-DB
                                              1                            18.CA.10020.26.odt

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10020 OF 2026
                                         IN WP/13023/2023
                                               WITH
                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 13023 OF 2023

                               MINAKSHI RAMKRUSHNA BHOJNE
                                             VERSUS
                           THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH
                        THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS
                                                ...
                     Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Biradar Ramrao Dhondiram
                         AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. M.K. Goyanka
                  Advocate for Respondents No.6 and 7 in WP : Mr. Kedar Warad
                    Advocate for Respondent No.4 in WP : Mr. V.V. Bhavthankar
                                                ...
                                  CORAM         : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                    ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                     DATE           : 11.09.2026

             PER COURT:

                       The petitioner is at liberty to amend the writ petition by placing

             on record the document sought to be placed on record by way of this

             civil application. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period

             of two weeks and the amended copy be served on the other side. The

             respondents are at liberty to file their affidavit-in-reply to the amended

             writ petition. Civil application is disposed of.



             (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                     (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)

             habeeb/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.