Bombay High Court
LAXMIBAI BABU BARI AND ORSversusTHE COLLECTOR JALGAON
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The court condoned the delay, allowed the cross‑objection to be registered, but denied interest and statutory benefits for the period of delay.
Summary
The applicants filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 1,538‑day delay in filing a cross‑objection to enhance compensation. They argued that they have a statutory right to seek increased compensation and thus should be given an opportunity to be heard. The court examined the reasons for the delay as set out in the application and, applying principles of equity, decided to condone the delay. It ordered that the cross‑objection be registered and listed with the first appeal, but clarified that the applicants would not be entitled to interest or statutory benefits for the period of delay. Consequently, the civil application was allowed.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 1,538 days in filing a cross‑objection can be condoned under civil procedure law
- Whether the applicants are entitled to interest and statutory benefits despite the condoned delay
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- cross objection
- civil procedure
- statutory benefits
- interest
- court order
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41266
1
935-ca-10113-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10113 OF 2026
IN X-OBJST/20514/2026
Laxmibai Babu Bari And Ors
VERSUS
The Collector Jalgaon
...
Ms. Renuka Pawar h/f Mr. V. P. Patil, Advocate for Applicants
Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, AGP for Respondent-State
Mr. S. S. Chillarge, Advocate for Respondent nos.3 and 4
…..
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 04TH SEPTEMBER, 2026
P.C. :-
. This application is filed for condonation of delay caused
in filing the Cross Objection.
2. It is submitted by learned Advocate for the applicants
that the reasons seeking condonation of delay have been
stated in the application. It is further submitted that the
applicants have a statutory right to seek enhancement of
compensation and for that an opportunity needs to be given to
them by condoning the delay and hearing them in the Cross
Objection.
3. Mr. S. S. Chillarge, learned Advocate for respondent
nos.3 and 4 and learned AGP for respondent State would pray
to pass appropriate orders.
2
935-ca-10113-2026
4. Considering that this application is filed in Cross
Objection by the claimants, I deem it appropriate to allow the
application condoning the delay caused in filing the Cross
Objection. Hence, considering the reasons justifying the delay
as stated in the application and for the reasons recorded
above, I pass following order:
ORDER
a. Civil Application stands allowed.
b. The delay of 1538 days caused in filing the
Cross Objection stands condoned.
c. Cross-Objection be registered.
d. It is made clear that the applicants shall not
be entitled for the interest and statutory benefits
for the period of delay.
e. Civil Application stands allowed.
CROSS OBJECTION ST. NO.20514 OF 2026
. Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGP waives
service of notice for respondent nos.1 and 2. Learned
Advocate Mr. S. S. Chillarge waives service of notice for
respondent nos.3 and 4.
2. Cross Objection be listed alongwith the First Appeal.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
Rushikesh/2026
Checking your session…