Bombay High Court
JAIRAJ MAHARUDRAPPA UTAGEversusRAJESHWARI DHANANJAY UTAGE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court held that an application may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the applicant fails to appear before the court.
Summary
Jairaj Maharudrapa Utage filed Civil Application No. 10138 of 2014 (WP/1483/2012) before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, against Rajeshwari Dhananjay Utage and others. The matter was listed for hearing on 3 August 2026. The counsel representing the applicant was absent on the scheduled date. The court recorded the absence and posted the matter for dismissal. As the applicant failed to appear or prosecute the application, the court dismissed the civil application for want of prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the civil application should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's non‑appearance.
Subjects
- civil procedure
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- non‑appearance
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37379
1 61-CA-10138-14.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10138 OF 2014
IN WP/1483/2012
JAIRAJ MAHARUDRAPPA UTAGE
VERSUS
RAJESHWARI DHANANJAY UTAGE AND OTHERS
...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 17-08-2026
PER COURT:-
1. Recording absence of the counsel for the applicant on
03.08.2026, the matter was posted for dismissal. Even today,
nobody is present for the applicant. As such, the civil application
stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
[SACHIN S. DESHMUKH]
JUDGE
rrd
Checking your session…