Bombay High Court
VITHAL SATWAJI GITE DIED THROUGH LRS MADHAV VITTHALRAO GITE AND ANOTHERversusSUGREEV MANIK YADAV AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The Court allowed both applications, condoned the delays, and set aside the abatements.
Summary
The appellant, Vithal Satwaji Gite, filed Civil Application No. 10163 of 2026 seeking condonation of a 225‑day delay in bringing the legal representatives of the deceased appellant on record and to set aside an abatement. Simultaneously, Civil Application No. 10164 of 2026 was filed to condone a 2,267‑day delay in bringing the legal representative of Respondent No.5 on record and to set aside the same abatement. The Court, after hearing the applicant’s counsel, noted that the substantive dispute between the parties must be decided on merits and that justice required relief. Accordingly, the Court condoned the delays, set aside both abatements, and ordered the necessary amendments to be made within two weeks, extending the time by an additional two weeks with a cost condition. The second appeal was listed for hearing on 24 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay of 225 days in filing Application No. 10163 can be condoned
- Whether the delay of 2,267 days in filing Application No. 10164 can be condoned
- Whether the abatement of the respective applications should be set aside
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- abatement
- civil procedure
- amendment
- second appeal
Judgment
ca10163.26
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
913 SECOND APPEAL NO. 35 OF 1998
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10164 OF 2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10163 OF 2026
IN SA/35/1998
Vithal Satwaji Gite
VERSUS
Sugreev Manika Yadav And Ors.
...
Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B.N. Gadegaonkar
…..
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. The civil application No. 10163 of 2026 is filed for
condonation of delay of 225 days caused in filing the application for
bringing the legal representatives of deceased appellant sole on
record and for setting aside the abatement.
2. In so far as the civil application No. 10164 of 2026 is
concerned, the same is filed for condonation of delay of 2267 days
caused in filing the civil application for bringing the legal
representatives of respondent No.5 on record by setting aside the
abatement.
ca10163.26
-2-
3. Perused the applications. Heard learned advocate for the
applicant. For the reasons stated in the applications and considering
the fact that the lis between the parties is required to be decided on
merits and in the interest of justice, the applications deserve to be
allowed.
4. Accordingly, the applications are allowed in terms of prayer
clauses “B” and “C”. Delay stands condoned. Abatement is set aside.
Amendment be carried out within two weeks from today.
5. Time is also extended by two weeks to carry out the
amendment as per the order dated 20.8.2026, failing which the costs
amount of Rs.2000/- be deposited in the office of High Court Legal
Services Sub Committee, Aurangabad.
6. List the second appeal on 24.09.2026.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.)
rlj/
Checking your session…