Bombay High Court

CHAITALI VASUDEO NEMADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The review petition is dismissed as there is no error apparent on the face of the record.

Summary

Chaitali Vasudeo Nemade filed a review petition seeking to recall the judgment dated 25‑11‑2025 in Writ Petition No. 14031 of 2025 against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant argued that the original order was based on wrong prayers. The Bench examined the petition and held that there was no error apparent on the face of the record to justify a review. Consequently, the review application was dismissed. However, the Court allowed the applicant to file a fresh petition with appropriate prayers to challenge the original order.

Issues considered

Whether the review petition can be entertained to recall the judgment dated 25‑11‑2025.
Whether there is any error apparent on the face of the record justifying a review.

Subjects

review petition
writ petition
recall of judgment
error apparent on record
civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:44105-DB
                                              -1-
                                                                  901-CA-1042-2026

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                            CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1042 OF 2026
                                            IN
                             WRIT PETITION NO. 14031 OF 2025

                              CHAITALI VASUDEO NEMADE
                                       VERSUS
              THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & OTHERS

                                              ..…
              Mr. Hemant P. Kshirsagar, Advocate for Applicant.
              Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
              Mr. P. N. Kalani, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5.
                                              .....

                                         CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT &
                                                 HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
                                          DATED : 22nd SEPTEMBER 2026
              PER COURT :

              1.          Heard learned Advocate for the applicant.


              2.          Present application is filed in the nature of Review
              petition seeking recalling of the judgment and order dated
              25.11.2025 passed in Writ Petition No. 14031 of 2025.


              3.          The application is perused. Learned Advocate for the
              applicant submits that the order which is impugned in the present
              application for recalling, in fact, was passed on the basis of the
              wrong prayers which were made in the earlier petition. Taking this
              submission into consideration, we do not find that the present
              application can be entertained because there is no error apparent
              on the face of record.


              4.          The application therefore stands dismissed.
                                 -2-
                                                     901-CA-1042-2026




5.         However, in order to preserve justice, this Court
permits the applicant to file fresh petition challenging the original
order which was impugned in Writ Petition No.14031 of 2025 by
making appropriate prayer.




 [HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.]                 [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]




Tandale

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…