Bombay High Court
POPAT BAPU DEVKAR AND OTHERSversusDATTU LAXMAN DEVKAR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court modified the interim order, permitting compensation to the owners of Gut Nos.364, 365, 366, 355 and 357 while keeping the restriction limited to Gut No.367 until the dispute is settled.
Summary
The petitioners, owners of Gut Nos.364, 365, 366, 355 and 357 in Mahindrawadi, challenged a Deputy Collector's order that accepted their objection only for Gut No.367 and withheld compensation for the other gut numbers. The High Court had earlier granted interim relief restraining the release of compensation to all landowners under the award dated 22‑12‑2023. The court examined the Deputy Collector's order and noted that the dispute pertained solely to Gut Nos.367 and 368, which are geographically separate from the lands of the petitioners. Consequently, the court held there was no justification to withhold compensation from the petitioners. It modified the interim order, allowing payment of compensation to the petitioners while maintaining the restriction only on Gut No.367 until the dispute is resolved. The civil application was thereafter disposed off.
Issues considered
- Whether the interim restraining order on payment of compensation to all landowners should be altered to permit payment to owners of Gut Nos.364, 365, 366, 355 and 357.
- Whether the restriction on compensation should continue only for Gut No.367 pending resolution of the dispute.
- Whether the Deputy Collector's order lawfully withheld compensation for the specified gut numbers.
Subjects
- Land acquisition
- Compensation
- Interim relief
- Writ petition
- Civil application
- Deputy Collector
- Gut numbers
- Restriction order
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42710
1 913-CA-10474-2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
913 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10474 OF 2026
IN WP/2770/2025
Popat Bapu Devkar And Others
VERSUS
Dattu Laxman Devkar And Others
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2770 OF 2025
Dattu Laxman Devkar And Others
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra The Secretary And Others
...
Adv.D.R. Adhav for Applicants and Respondent Nos.5,7,9 to 12 in WP.
Mr.Shinde Chandrakant K. for the Petitioners.
Mr.Kishor Hoke Patil, AGP for the Respondent/State.
….
CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 10.09.2026
PER COURT :
1. This Civil Application has been filed by Respondent Nos.5, 7,
9, 10, 11 and 12 in the Writ Petition. The Petitioners are challenging the
order dated 25th January, 2025, passed by the Deputy Collector (Land
Acquisition) Minor Irrigation, Beed. By this order, the objection raised by
the Petitioners dated 13th September, 2024 has been accepted to the
extent of Gut No.367. In the impugned order, the Deputy Collector has
passed an order that so far as the owners of Gut Nos.364, 365, 366, 355
and 357, whose lands have been acquired for the Plant No.2 at
Mahindrawadi, Taluka Patoda, District Beed are concerned, they shall be
entitled for compensation upon furnishing necessary documents.
Sunny Thote
2 913-CA-10474-2026.odt
2. It is further observed that so far as the Gut No.367 and 368,
which are adjoining lands, the report of the Deputy Superintendent of
Land Record would be necessary and upon receiving those reports, a
decision would be taken in respect of these two gut numbers. Therefore,
the compensation in respect of these two gut numbers was directed to be
withheld.
3. The present Applicants are the owners of Gut Nos. 364, 365,
366, 355 and 357. They have filed the present application seeking
direction to vacate the interim relief granted by this Court vide order
dated 5th March 2025. By the said order, this Court had granted interim
relief in terms of prayer clause [D], which reads thus:
“D] Pending hearing and final disposal of the petition,
the respondent no. 2 and 3 be restrained from releasing
the payment of compensation under the award dated
22/12/2023 in file no. 23/LNQ/SR/24/07.”
4. After going through the impugned order passed by the
Deputy Collector dated 25th January, 2025, it is evident that the dispute is
regarding the inclusion of Gut Nos.367 and 368 at village Mahendrawadi,
Talauka Patoda, District Beed, therefore, there is no reason for
withholding the amounts of other land owners, whose lands have been
acquired. It is submitted that even geographically those lands are quite
far away from the land, which is under dispute. This position is also not
disputed by the learned Advocate for the Petitioners, who has filed the
Writ Petition.
Sunny Thote
3 913-CA-10474-2026.odt
5. In view thereof, the order passed by this Court on 5 th March,
2025 is modified by directing that the Applicants shall be entitled for a
compensation according to the Award dated 22 nd December, 2023 passed
by the Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) Minor Irrigation, Beed.
6. The restriction imposed by this Court for disbursement of
compensation to the landowners of Gut Nos.367 and 368 shall continue
to operate only to the extent of Gut No.367, till the dispute is resolved.
7. In view of the aforesaid terms, the Civil Application stands
disposed off.
[ MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. ]
Sunny Thote
Checking your session…