Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHREE SAIBABA SANSTHAN TRUST SHIRDI THR ITS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court held that permission may be granted to implement the resolution and make compassionate‑ground appointments in accordance with the increased reservation policy.

Summary

The Shree Saibaba Sansthan Trust filed a civil application seeking the court's permission to implement Resolution No.391 dated 03.07.2024, which was passed by an Adhoc Committee. The resolution proposes to appoint candidates on compassionate ground by exhausting the waiting list for the remaining 10% of vacancies, in line with a recent government policy that increased the reservation for such appointments from 10% to 20%. The State of Maharashtra opposed the application, arguing that the court should not interfere with policy implementation. After hearing counsel for both sides, the bench held that the application was in conformity with the revised reservation policy and the resolution. Consequently, the court allowed the application as per prayer clause (B), permitting the appointments on compassionate ground.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can grant permission to implement Resolution No.391 and appoint candidates on compassionate ground by using the waiting list for the remaining 10% of vacancies.

Subjects

  • reservation
  • compassionate ground appointments
  • civil application
  • implementation of resolution
  • government policy
  • waiting list
  • adhoc committee

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:44628-DB
                                                                            28-(v).CA.1054.2025.doc


                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                                  CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1054 OF 2025
                                             IN PIL/98/2021
                  Shree Saibaba Sansthan Trust Shirdi Thr Its Administrative Officer
                                                 VERSUS
                       The State of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary
                                                    …
               Mr. Anil S. Bajaj , Advocate for the Applicant.
               Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for the Respondent-State.
               Mr. Ajinkya Kale h/f. Talekar & Associates, Advocate for the Petitioner in
               PIL.
               Mr. V. D. Hon, Senior Advocate i/by Mr. Ashvin V. Hon, Advocate for
               Respondent No.14 in PIL.             …
                                                CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT &
                                                        JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
                                                DATE     : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2026
               PER COURT :
               1.       Heard learned Advocate for the applicant and learned Advocate

               for the respondent.

               2.       This civil application is filed seeking permission to implement

               Resolution No.391 dated 03.07.2024, pursuant to the Proposal No.5

               passed by the Adhoc Committee. Permission is sought to make

               appointments of candidates on compassionate ground by exhausting

               waiting list for remaining 10% of the vacancies. It is in view of the

               Government policy by which now the reservation for appointments on

               compassionate ground is increased from 10% to 20%.

               3.       With this, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause

               (B).


                    (JITENDRA JAIN, J.)                        (KISHORE C. SANT, J.)
               Sayyed                                                                                 1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.