Bombay High Court
CHINDU ESHRAM SURWADE DIED THROUGH LRS VANDANA AND ORS.versusEXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.I.W. JALGAON.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The Court condoned the delay, quashed the abatement, and permitted amendment of the appeal’s title to include the legal representatives.
Summary
The case involves an application filed by the legal representatives of the deceased applicant Sunil Eshram Surwade in a civil suit against the Executive Engineer, M.I.W., Jalgaon. The applicants sought condonation of a 736‑day delay in filing the application, alleging that they were unaware of the proceedings. They also prayed that any abatement of the suit be set aside and that the title of the appeal be amended to reflect the names of the legal representatives. The Court examined whether the delay could be justified under the principles of equity and whether the procedural bar of abatement should operate. Finding that the delay was caused by genuine unawareness and that no prejudice was shown to the respondent, the Court condoned the delay. Accordingly, the Court quashed any abatement and ordered that the title of the appeal be amended to include the legal representatives’ names within four weeks. The application was allowed and the civil application was disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the 736‑day delay in filing the application can be condoned
- Whether the abatement of the suit should be set aside
- Whether the title of the appeal may be amended to include the legal representatives
Subjects
- delay condonation
- abatement
- title amendment
- legal representatives
- civil application
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:46340
1
963 CA 10634 OF 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
963 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10634 OF 2026
IN FA/635/2019
CHINDU ESHRAM SURWADE DIED THROUGH LRS
VANDANA AND ORS.
VERSUS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.I.W. JALGAON.
...
Mr. A. E. Madne h/f. Mr. A. B. Kale, Advocate for Applicants
Mr. Pratik Borge h/f. Mr. A. D. Pawar, Advocate for
Respondent
…
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 1st October 2026
P.C. :-
. In the First Appeal filed by the acquiring body, this
application is filed by the legal representatives of the deceased
applicant Sunil Eshram Surwade. There is delay of 736 days
caused in filing the application. It is stated that due to
unawareness of the present proceedings, the application could
not be moved earlier through the learned Advocate. No sooner
did they come to know about the proceeding, immediately the
application is filed. The interest and right of the deceased
applicant Sunil have devolved upon the applicants in their
capacity as legal representatives.
2
963 CA 10634 OF 2026
2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Delay stands condoned. Abatement, if any, is
quashed and set aside.
3. The appellant is permitted to amend the title clause of
the appeal and applications therein, if any, by incorporating
the names of legal representatives of the deceased applicant –
Sunil Eshram Surwade.
4. Let such amendment be carried out within four weeks
from today.
5. Civil Application stands disposed of.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
PRW
Checking your session…