Bombay High Court
CHHABUBAI BHASKARRAO (DIED) THR LRS ARUN (DIED) THR LRS PRAMILA AND ORSversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MIDC JALGAON
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The Court condoned the delay of 326 and 324 days in filing cross‑objections as the main first appeals are pending and admitted.
Summary
The petitioners filed two civil applications seeking condonation of a delay of 326 and 324 days in filing cross‑objections. The delay was explained in the applications, noting that the main first appeals filed by the acquiring body are pending and already admitted before the Court. The Court considered these circumstances sufficient to justify condoning the delay. Consequently, the applications were allowed, and the delay was condoned. The petitioners were directed to remove all office objections within four weeks, failing which the order would lose effect, and were informed that no interest or statutory benefits would be payable for the delayed period.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay of 326 and 324 days in filing cross‑objections can be condoned.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- civil procedure
- cross‑objections
- interest
- statutory benefits
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42200
1
946 CA 10662 OF 2026+947
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
946 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10662 OF 2026
IN X-OBJST/22040/2026
DHANJI NAMDEO KHAIRNAR/CHOUDHARI (DEAD) THR
LRS KESARBAI DIED THR LRS MADHAV AND ORS.
VERSUS
EX. ENGINEER, M.I.D.C., JALGAON AND ORS.
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7910 OF 2019
IN FA/404/2021
EX. ENGINEER, M.I.D.C., JALGAON
VERSUS
DHANJI NAMDEO KHAIRNAR (DEAD) THR LRS KESARBAI
AND ORS
AND
947 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10663 OF 2026
IN X-OBJST/21807/2026
CHHABUBAI BHASKARRAO (DIED) THR LRS ARUN (DIED)
THR LRS PRAMILA AND ORS
VERSUS
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MIDC JALGAON
...
Ms. M. S. Andhare h/f. Mr. A. B. Kale, Advocate for Applicants
in both matters
Mr. B. V. Virdhe and Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, AGP for
Respondent Nos.2 and 3 – State respectively
Mr. G. S. Khaire h/f. Mr. S. S. Dande, Advocate for
Respondent No.1 in both matters
…
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 11th September 2026
2
946 CA 10662 OF 2026+947
P.C. :-
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10662 OF 2026
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10663 OF 2026
. These Civil Applications are filed seeking condonation
of delay of 326 and 324 days respectively caused in filing the
cross-objections.
2. The delay is well explained in paragraph Nos.2 to 6 of
the applications. Considering that the main First Appeals filed
by the acquiring body are pending in this Court and are
already admitted, the delay deserves to be condoned.
3. For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are
allowed. Delay of 326 and 324 days respectively caused in
filing the cross-objections stands condoned.
4. The applicants shall remove all the office objections
within a period of four weeks from today. If the objections are
not removed within stipulated period, this order shall
automatically lose its effect.
5. Suffice to note, in the event the cross objections are
allowed, the applicants shall not be entitled for interest and
statutory benefits for the delayed period.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
PRW
Checking your session…