Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LAXMAN TIMA DANDGULE L.RS. SONABAI and OTHERSversusHARIBHAU GOMA PAWAR and ORS

Disposal
APPLICATION ALLOWED

Holding

The application for fixing an early hearing was allowed.

Summary

The appeal (Second Appeal No. 1614 of 2005) was pending before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The appellants filed Civil Application No. 10704 of 2025 seeking an early hearing of the appeal. The court examined whether the application for early fixation should be granted. The bench allowed the application and ordered the appeal to be listed for final hearing on 29‑08‑2026, directing both sides to argue then. It warned that any further adjournment would attract heavy costs. Consequently, the application was disposed of and the appeal was adjourned.

Issues considered

  • Whether the application for fixing an early hearing of the appeal should be allowed

Subjects

  • civil procedure
  • early hearing
  • adjournment
  • costs

Judgment

                                              905 SA NO. 1614 OF 2005.odt


       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD
             905 SECOND APPEAL NO. 1614 OF 2005

                 Laxman Tima Dandgule And Anr
                            VERSUS
                   Hariba Goma Pawar And Ors
                                ...
Ms. M. A. Kulkarni, Advocate for Appellants
Mr. Ajay Shinde, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2-i to 2-vi, and 4
                              WITH
             CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10704 OF 2025
                        IN SA/1614/2005
                               ….

                    CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
                      DATE : 21.08.2026
PER COURT :-

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10704 OF 2025

1.        This is an application for fixing early hearing of the

appeal.

2.        Perused the application. For the reasons stated therein,

the application is allowed and disposed of.


SECOND APPEAL NO. 1614 OF 2005

1.        Mr. Ajay Shinde, learned Advocate for Respondent

Nos.2-i to 2-vi, and 4 seeks time.

2.        Stand over to 29.08.2026, for final hearing.

3.        Learned Advocates for both sides are directed to argue


                                                                 1 of 2
                                  (( 2 ))       905 SA NO. 1614 OF 2005


the appeal finally on the next date.    If an adjournment is sought by

either of the parties on the next date, the party seeking such

adjournment shall be liable to pay/deposit heavy costs.




                                       [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ]
HRJadhav




                                                                 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.