Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GOVINDRAO RAMRAO KORDE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court allowed the civil application, ordered amendment within two weeks, imposed a stay on adverse action, and directed respondents to file their replies within four weeks.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench allowed the civil application filed by Govindrao Ramrao Korde and others, granting relief under prayer clause B. The court directed that the amendment to the application be effected within two weeks and that a copy be served on the respondents. It ordered the respondents, who had not filed a reply to the writ petition, to submit their replies within four weeks. A stay was imposed on any adverse action against the petitioners' property pending further orders. The judgment reflects procedural directions to ensure compliance by both parties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the civil application seeking amendment should be allowed.
  • Whether a stay on adverse action against the petitioners' property is warranted.
  • Whether the respondents should be directed to file a reply within a specified time.

Subjects

  • amendment
  • stay order
  • civil procedure
  • writ petition
  • property
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:45801-DB


                                                                       ca11392-26.doc
                 drp
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11392 OF 2026
                                               IN
                                 WRIT PETITION NO.5642 OF 2024

                 Govindrao Ramrao Korde and Others                     APPLICANTS
                      VERSUS
                 The State of Maharashtra and Others                RESPONDENTS

                                               .......
                 Mr. Shubham Koche h/f Mr. D. P. Palodkar, Advocate for Applicant
                 Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondent - State
                                               ....…

                              [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
                                       ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]

                                      DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026
                 ORDER :

                 1.     For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, the same is
                 allowed in terms of prayer clause “B”.


                 2.     Amendment be carried out within two weeks from today.
                 Amended copy be served on the other side.


                 3.     The Respondents have not filed reply to the Writ Petition
                 till today. The Respondents shall file their respective replies
                 within four weeks thereafter.


                 4.     Until further orders, no adverse action be taken against
                 Petitioners’ property.



                 [ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ]                   [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
                        JUDGE                                        JUDGE

                 drp/ca11392-26.doc


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.