Bombay High Court
MANGAL W/O LAXMAN BAHIRWAL AND OTHERSversusSUBHASH S/O SHIVAJI GUJAR AND ANOTHER.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The court allowed the civil applications in terms of prayer clause B.
Summary
The petitioners, Mangal w/o Laxman Bahirwal and others, and Sangita w/o Appa Ranmare and others, filed civil applications against respondents Subhash and Navnath respectively. Respondent No.1 was duly served but failed to appear before the court. The court, after noting the service and non-appearance, allowed both civil applications in accordance with prayer clause B of the pleadings. No further evidence or argument was presented by the absent respondent. The court directed that the appeals be registered, effectively granting the relief sought by the petitioners.
Subjects
- default judgment
- civil procedure
- service of notice
- application dismissed
- prayer clause
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38350
1 32-CA-12172-25.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
32 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12172 OF 2025
IN FAST/29656/2025
MANGAL W/O LAXMAN BAHIRWAL AND OTHERS
VERSUS
SUBHASH S/O SHIVAJI GUJAR AND ANOTHER.
...
33 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12174 OF 2025 IN FAST/29660/202325
SANGITA W/O APPA RANMARE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
NAVNATH S/O RANGNATH HATAVATE AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Swapnil S. Dargad
Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Mr. Aniruddha S. Usmanpurkar
Respondent No.1 served
…
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 21-08-2026
PER COURT:-
1. Though served, none appeared for respondent No.1.
2. For the reasons stated in the applications, the civil
applications are allowed in terms of prayeer clause “B”. Office to
registere the appeals.
[SACHIN S. DESHMUKH]
JUDGE
rrd
Checking your session…