Bombay High Court
ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD THROUGH BRANCH MANAGERversusRENUKA PRADIP SANGALE, AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
- Bench
- ABHAY MANTRI
Holding
The court condoned the 64‑day delay in filing the appeal.
Summary
The applicant, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 64‑day delay in filing an appeal. The respondents did not object to the condonation, and two of the respondents were absent despite being served. The court considered the lack of objection and the grounds stated in the application, and decided to condone the delay, ordering the appeal to be registered. Subsequently, the court issued notice to the respondents, with the respondents waiving service of notice, and directed the parties to produce the trial court evidence for a further hearing scheduled for 20‑07‑2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 64 days in filing an appeal can be condoned under the applicable procedural law.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- appeal
- civil procedure
- service of notice
- urgent order
Judgment
(1) 2ca12334.25.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
2 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12334 OF 2025
IN FAST/32029/2025
ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD THROUGH
BRANCH MANAGER
….Applicant
VERSUS
RENUKA PRADIP SANGALE, AND OTHERS
…..Respondent
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5424 OF 2026
IN FAST/32029/2025
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12335 OF 2025
IN FAST/32029/2025
Mr. Abhijit Choudhari, Advocate for the Applicant
Mr. S. S. Daragad,d Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1,3 and 4
Mr. P. P. Kothari, Advocate for the Respondent No. 5
CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.
DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2026
PER COURT :
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12334 OF 2025
IN FAST/32029/2025
1. Heard the learned Advocate for the parties and perused
the record.
2. This is an Application for condonation of the delay of 64
days caused in filing the Appeal, for which the learned Advocate for
the Respondents have not objected to condoning the delay.
1 of 3
(2) 2ca12334.25.odt
3. Respondent Nos. 6 & 7, though served, remained absent.
4. Having considered the no objection of the learned
Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4, the Respondent No. 5,
and the grounds stated in the Application in para-Nos. 2 to 4, I deem it
appropriate to condone the delay. Consequently, the Application is
allowed in terms of the prayer clause B . Accordingly, the delay is
condoned.
5. Office to register the Appeal in accordance with the law.
FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 32029 OF 2025
1. Heard.
2. Learned Advocate for the Appellant and perused the
record.
3. Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on 20-07-2026.
Mr. Dargad, learned Advocate, waives service of notice for the
Respondent Nos. 1,3 and 4. Mr. Kothari, learned Advocate, waives
service of notice on behalf of the Respondent No. 5.
4. Call R & P.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5424 OF 2026
IN FAST/32029/2025
1. The parties are directed to produce the entire evidence
laid by both parties before the learned Trial Court, along with the
2 of 3
(3) 2ca12334.25.odt
exhibited documents.
2. Stand over to 20-07-2026, in urgent order category.
[ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ]
VishalK/2ca12334.25.odt
3 of 3
Checking your session…