Bombay High Court
HAVGIRAO KAREPPA SHETKAR DIED THROUGH LRS NILESH HAVGIRAO SHETKARAND OTHERS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOER LATUR AND ANR.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The delay is condoned, but the applicants are not entitled to interest or statutory benefits for the delayed period.
Summary
The applicants, the heirs of deceased Havgirao Kareppa Shetkar and Nagappa Sangappa Lasune, filed applications seeking condonation of a 6,341‑day delay in preferring first appeals against orders of the State of Maharashtra. The court noted that the applicants' averments were uncontroverted and found no oblique motive, and the applicants were willing to forgo interest and statutory benefits accrued during the delay. The court therefore condoned the delay but conditioned the condonation on the applicants not being entitled to any interest or statutory benefits for the delayed period. Service of notice to the State was waived, and the record was called for without printing. Consequently, the applications for condonation were allowed subject to the stated condition.
Issues considered
- Whether the court may condone a delay of 6,341 days in preferring first appeals.
- Whether the applicants are entitled to interest and statutory benefits for the period of delay.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- interest
- statutory benefits
- civil appeals
- high court
Judgment
(1) 129 CA 12578 OF 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
129 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12578 OF 2025
IN FAST/32566/2025
HAVGIRAO KAREPPA SHETKAR DIED THROUGH LRS NILESH HAVGIRAO
SHETKARAND OTHERS.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOER LATUR AND
ANR.
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12785 OF 2025
IN FAST/32568/2025
NAGAPPA SANGAPPA LASUNE DIED THR. LRS. SHIVKANT NAGAPPA
LASUNE AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE COLLECTOR LATUR AND ANOTHER
…
Mr. H. B. Nandagavale, Advocate for Applicants
Mr. S. N. Morampalle, AGP for Respondent/s-State
…
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 20.02.2026
PER COURT :-
. The applicants seek to condone delay of 6341 days in preferring
the appeals.
2. The averments of the applications have not been controverted.
There is no reason to infer any oblique motive on the part of the applicants.
They are ready to give up the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed
(2) 129 CA 12578 OF 2025
period.
3. The delay stands condoned on condition that the applicants shall
not be entitled to the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period.
FIRST APPEALS STAMP NO.
4. Admit. Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent/s-
State.
5. Call for Record and Proceeding. Print is dispensed with.
6. The appellants shall not be entitled to the interest and statutory
benefits for the delayed period.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. )
PRW
Checking your session…