Bombay High Court
SAMBHAJI ARJUN MALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court waived the court fee objection due to legal aid and condoned the delay, thereby restoring the writ petition.
Summary
The petitioner’s writ petition was initially dismissed because court fees had not been paid. However, the petition was assigned legal aid, leading the court to waive the fee objection. The petitioner filed a civil application seeking condonation of the delay in filing the writ petition. The court examined whether the fee objection could be set aside on legal aid grounds and whether the delay warranted condonation. It held that the legal aid waiver removed the fee objection and that the delay was condoned. Consequently, the writ petition was restored and the civil application was disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the objection to non-payment of court fees can be waived when the matter is assigned legal aid.
- Whether the delay in filing the writ petition can be condoned.
Subjects
- legal aid
- court fees
- condonation of delay
- writ petition
- civil application
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39377-DB
1 28.CA.13707.25.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13707 OF 2025
IN WPST/13773/2025
SAMBHAJI ARJUN MALI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Deshmukh Sakharam G.
AGP for Respondents: Mr. N. D. Batule
...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 29.08.2026
PER COURT:
1. The writ petition was dismissed for non-removal of office
objections, as the Court fees were not paid. However, since the matter
was allotted to legal aid, the objection is waived.
2. For the reasons stated in the civil application, the delay is
condoned. The writ petition is restored. Civil application is disposed
of.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
habeeb/
Checking your session…