Bombay High Court
JYOTI SATISH KADAM AND OTHERSversusJYOTI NITIN THOSAR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition was held to be infructuous and therefore dismissed.
Summary
Petitioners Jyoti Satish Kadam et al. filed a writ petition challenging certain actions of respondents Jyoti Nitin Thosar et al. During the pendency of the petition, the underlying Regular Civil Suit No. 278 of 2021 was finally disposed by the 8th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar. The respondents argued that with the disposal of the civil suit, there was nothing left for the writ petition to address. The Court agreed, holding that the writ petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous and any accompanying civil applications, if any, were also dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition remains maintainable after the final disposal of the underlying civil suit?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- civil suit disposal
- jurisdiction
- petition dismissal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41816
1
903 WP 15829 OF 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 WRIT PETITION NO. 15829 OF 2023
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14063 OF 2025
IN WP/15829/2023
JYOTI SATISH KADAM AND OTHERS
VERSUS
JYOTI NITIN THOSAR AND OTHERS
...
Mr. P. P. Dhorde, Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. Karan V. Sarosiya h/f. Mr. S. S. Bora, Advocate for
Respondent Nos.1 to 3
…
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 8th September 2026
P.C. :-
. Mr. Karan V. Sarosiya h/f. Mr. S. S. Bora, learned
Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3 submits that during the
pendency of this writ petition, Regular Civil Suit No.278 of
2021 is disposed of finally by the learned 8 th Joint Civil Judge,
Senior Division, Ahmednagar. In view of this, nothing survives
in this writ petition.
2. The Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
3. Civil Applications, if any, stand disposed of.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
PRW
Checking your session…