Bombay High Court
PRANALI VASANT AVHADversusSAROJINI BALWANT TARGE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petitions are deemed infructuous and are therefore disposed of.
Summary
Petitioner Pranali filed writ petitions (Nos. 3509/2014 and 3510/2014) along with a civil application in 2014‑2015 against respondents Sarojini and others. The petitioner, through counsel, argued that the considerable passage of time had rendered the petitions infructuous. The Court examined whether the lapse of time could defeat the petitioner's relief. Finding that the petitions were indeed rendered ineffective by the delay, the Court held them to be infructuous. Consequently, the Court ordered that the pending civil applications be disposed of as well.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petitions become infructuous due to the passage of time
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- passage of time
- disposal
- civil application
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37579
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3509 OF 2014 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14187/2015
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.3510 OF 2014
Pranali w/o Vasant Avhad … PETITIONER
VERSUS
Sarojini w/o Balwant Targe & ors. … RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. Devang Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner
....…
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 20th AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits
that, by passage of time, the present petitions are rendered infructuous. As
such, the petitions stand disposed of as infructuous. Consequently,
pending Civil Applications are disposed of.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
fmp/-
Checking your session…