Bombay High Court
SMT KALABAI KASHINATH PATIL (DEAD) THR LRS USHABAI DIED THR LRS YUVRAJ FULA PATIL AND ORSversusMR TUKARAM SHENPHADU PATIL AND ORS
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The court held that the seven‑day delay in filing the second appeal is condoned as it is not deliberate and is in the interest of justice.
Summary
The petitioners filed Civil Application No. 14210 of 2023 seeking condonation of a seven‑day delay in filing a second appeal. The respondent No.1‑b opposed the condonation, but the court examined the reasons provided and found the delay was not deliberate. Relying on the principle of justice, the court held that such a short, non‑deliberate delay may be condoned. Consequently, the application for condonation was allowed, and the delay was condoned. The court also issued notice to the respondents in the second appeal and related stay application, with service waived by respondent No.1‑b and representation by counsel for respondent No.2‑a.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of seven days in filing a second appeal can be condoned under the principles of civil procedure
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- second appeal
- civil procedure
- interest of justice
- service waiver
Judgment
ca14210.23
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
967 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14210 OF 2023
IN SAST/22445/2023
Smt Kalabai Kashinath Patil (dead) Thr Lrs Ushabai Died Thr Lrs
Yuvraj Fula Patil And Ors
VERSUS
Mr Tukaram Shenphadu Patil And Ors
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Pandurang S Koshti
Advocate for Respondent No. 1-b : Mr. Girish Rane
…
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14209 OF 2023
IN SAST/22445/2023
…..
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 01st OCTOBER, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. The civil application No.14210 of 2023 is filed for
condonation of delay of 07 days caused in filing the second appeal.
2. Perused the application and heard learned advocates for
both sides. Learned advocate for respondent No. 1-b strongly
opposed the application. However, considering the reasons stated
in the application, it appears that the delay caused is not deliberate.
Therefore, the application is allowed. The delay caused in filing the
appeal is condoned in the interest of justice.
ca14210.23
-2-
3. In second appeal as well as in civil application for stay,
issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 29.10.2026.
4. Mr. Girish Rane, waives service for respondent No. 1-b.
The respondent No.2-a is already served and advocate Mr. B.R.
Warma has caused appearance on behalf of the said respondent.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.)
rlj/
Checking your session…