Bombay High Court
RAM AMBAJI KADBANE DIED THROUGH LRS VASANT AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The Court condoned the delay and allowed the civil applications for condonation of delay.
Summary
Three civil applications were filed seeking condonation of delay of 588, 630 and 639 days in filing first appeals against orders of the State of Maharashtra. The applicants explained the reasons for the delay in paragraphs 7 and 8 of their applications. The Court examined whether the explanations satisfied the requirement of sufficient cause for condoning such lengthy delays. Finding the explanations satisfactory, the Court held that the delay deserved condonation. Consequently, the applications were allowed, the delays were condoned, the first appeals were ordered to be registered, and the civil applications were disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay of 588, 630 and 639 days in filing first appeals can be condoned under the principles of civil procedure
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- civil procedure
- first appeal
- court discretion
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38803
1 943 to 045 ca 1944.26
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
943 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1944 OF 2026
IN
FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 37042 OF 2025
Ram Ambaji Kadbane
Since deceased through his L.Rs.
Vasant and others .. Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
AND
944 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3458 OF 2026
IN
FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 413 OF 2025
Shabbir Jainu Mulla (Mullani)
Since deceased through his L.Rs.
Sugarabbi and others .. Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
AND
945 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3502 OF 2026
IN
FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 36682 OF 2025
Fulchand Madhav Bhosale .. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri A. P. Nahar, Advocate h/f Shri Anand P. Bhandari,
Advocate for the Applicants in all matters.
Mrs. Dr. Kalplata B. Patil Bharaswadkar, A.G.P. for the
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in C. A. No. 1944/2026 and C. A. No.
3502/2026.
Mrs. V. S. Choudhari, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in
C. A. No. 3458/2026.
2 943 to 045 ca 1944.26
Shri R. A. Tambe, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3 in C. A. No.
3458/2026.
Mrs. Sunita D. Shelke, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3 in C.
A. No. 3502/2026.
CORAM : MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 27TH AUGUST, 2026.
ORDER :
. These civil applications are for condonation of delay of 588,
630 and 639 days respectively caused in filing first appeals.
Present civil applications are filed by the claimants.
2. The reason for delay has been explained by the applicants
in para Nos. 7 and 8 of the applications. In view of the
explanation given by the applicants, the delay deserves to be
condoned.
3. For the reasons stated in the applications, the civil
applications are allowed. The delay is condoned. Office shall
register the first appeals. The civil applications are disposed of.
[ MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE J. ]
bsb/Aug. 26
Checking your session…