Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MS STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORYversusTHE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The application is allowed; delay is condoned subject to a cost deposit, the writ petition is restored, and the petitioner must remove office objections within four weeks.

Summary

Sterlite Technologies Ltd filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay and restoration of its writ petition against the Union of India. The High Court examined whether the delay could be condoned and the writ petition reinstated. The Court allowed the application, condoning the delay on the condition that the petitioner deposit Rs.5,000 with the Advocates' Association. The writ petition was restored, and the petitioner was directed to remove the office objections within four weeks. The order was pronounced by Justices Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Abasaheb D. Shinde.

Issues considered

  • Whether the delay in filing the civil application can be condoned
  • Whether the writ petition can be restored
  • Whether the petitioner must remove office objections within a specified period

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • writ petition restoration
  • civil application
  • office objections
  • cost deposit
  • High Court of Bombay

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39374-DB
                                               1                           26.CA.2564.25.odt

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2564 OF 2025
                                        IN WPST/3174/2024

                    MS STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED THROUGH
                                ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
                                            VERSUS
                              THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH
                            THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OTHERS
                                               ...
              Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Chirag Shetty i/b. Mr. Amit A. Yadkikar
                     Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Dwarkadas S. Ladda
                                               ...
                                 CORAM         : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                   ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                     DATE          : 29.08.2026


             PER COURT:

             1.        For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, the same is

             allowed. The delay is condoned subject to deposit of costs of Rs.5000/-

             (Rupees Five Thousand only) with the Advocates' Association of

             Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad.

             2.        Writ petition is restored. Petitioner to remove office objections

             within a period of four weeks from today.



             (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                    (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




             habeeb/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.