Bombay High Court

RITESH RAMESH JADHAVversusSARIKA RITESH JADHAV

Disposal: Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The court allowed the application in terms of prayer clause B and disposed of the matter accordingly.

Summary

In Civil Application No. 2632 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, the petitioner Ritesh Ramesh Jadav filed an application against respondent Sarika Ritesh Jadhav. The court examined the grounds raised in the application and found merit in the relief sought under prayer clause B. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and disposed of the matter on that basis. The judges directed that the appeal, if any, should be registered only after removal of any office objections. No further substantive issues were addressed.

Issues considered

Whether the application should be allowed as per prayer clause B

Subjects

civil procedure
application
court order
appeal registration

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37426-DB

                                                                         940 ca 2632-25 .




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                         940 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2632 OF 2025
                                    IN FCAST/410/2025

                               RITESH RAMESH JADHAV
                                         VERSUS
                                SARIKA RITESH JADHAV
                                            ...
          Mr. Wakure Sanjay A, Advocate for Applicant
          Mr. Shinde Manoj D., Advocate for Respondent
                                            ….

                                  CORAM        :   SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
                                                   VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                  Date         :   19/08/2026

          PER COURT :


          1.    Heard.
          2.    For the reasons stated in the application, the application stands
          allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and disposed of accordingly.
          3.    The appeal of the applicant be registered after removal of office
          objections, if any.




          [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]                      [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE]
                       JUDGE                                 JUDGE




                  VS Maind/                                          Page|1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…