Bombay High Court
BHILA S/O BHIKA PATIL (DIED) THROUGH L.RS. GAYABAI BHILA PATIL AND OTHERSversusTHE COLLECTOR, THROUGH SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, JAYAKWADI PRAKALP NO. 1, AURANGABAD AND ANO
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The delay is condoned subject to the claimants' undertaking not to claim any statutory benefit or interest during the delayed period.
Summary
The claimants filed an appeal after a delay of 4,254 days, which they explained as non‑intentional in their civil applications. The court examined whether such a lengthy delay could be condoned. Finding the explanation satisfactory, the court conditioned the condonation on the claimants giving an undertaking not to claim any statutory benefit or interest for the period of delay. The court ordered the claimants to furnish this undertaking within four weeks. Accordingly, the civil applications were allowed as per prayer clause ‘B’. The judgment emphasizes the court’s discretion to condone delay while safeguarding public revenue.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 4,254 days in filing an appeal can be condoned under the Civil Procedure Code.
- Whether the claimants may claim statutory benefits or interest for the period of delay if the delay is condoned.
Subjects
- delay condonation
- civil procedure
- limitation period
- statutory benefit
- interest
- land acquisition
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41087
1 1081.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3160 OF 2026
IN FAST/3846/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3161 OF 2026
IN FAST/3841/2026
MANDABAI SAKHARAM JAGTAP (DIED) THROUGH L.RS.
AMBADAS SAKHARAM JAGTAP AND OTHERS.
VERSUS
THE COLLECTOR, THR SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
JAYAKWADI PRAKALP NO. 1, AURANGABAD AND ANR.
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. S.D. Jayabhar
AGP for Respondent No. 1 : Ms. Preeti Diggikar
…
CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 03rd SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. There is a delay of 4254 days in filing the Appeal by the
Claimants.
2. Respondent no. 2 is served. Learned AGP appears for
Respondent no. 1.
3. The delay has been explained by the Claimants in paragraph
nos. 5 to 7 in the Civil Applications, which is satisfactory. Delay is not
intentional nor deliberate.
2 1081.odt
4. Delay is condoned subject to condition that the Claimants
shall furnish an undertaking to the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court that
they will not claim any statutory benefit and the interest during the
delayed period, within a period of four weeks.
5. Civil Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’.
( MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. )
SPC
Checking your session…