Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Mayur Ravindra KambleversusDistrict Health Officer Zilla Parishad Latur

Disposal
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The court held that the delay in filing the cross‑objection may be condoned.

Summary

Mayur Ravindra Kamble filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing a cross‑objection against the District Health Officer, Zilla Parishad Latur. The respondent was served but did not appear before the court. The applicant submitted reasons for the delay in a separate application. The court examined the reasons provided and exercised its discretion to allow the condonation. Consequently, the cross‑objection filed after the prescribed period was deemed valid.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court may condone the delay in filing a cross‑objection?

Subjects

  • condonation of delay
  • cross‑objection
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38937



                                                                  36 CA3264.2026
                                              -1-

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                           36 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3264 OF 2026
                   IN X-OBJST/7248/2026 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 489 OF 2026

                               MAYUR RAVINDRA KAMBLE
                                           VERSUS
                  DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER ZILLA PARISHAD LATUR
                                              ...
              Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Fayaz Khurshid Patel
                                              ...

                                          CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                             Date : 27.08.2026

              PER COURT :-

              1.           Although the respondents are served, none present.


              2.           For the reasons stated in the application        for

              condonation of delay in filing the Cross-Objection, the same is

              allowed.




                                                    (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)

              marathe


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.