Bombay High Court
Mayur Ravindra KambleversusDistrict Health Officer Zilla Parishad Latur
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The court held that the delay in filing the cross‑objection may be condoned.
Summary
Mayur Ravindra Kamble filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing a cross‑objection against the District Health Officer, Zilla Parishad Latur. The respondent was served but did not appear before the court. The applicant submitted reasons for the delay in a separate application. The court examined the reasons provided and exercised its discretion to allow the condonation. Consequently, the cross‑objection filed after the prescribed period was deemed valid.
Issues considered
- Whether the court may condone the delay in filing a cross‑objection?
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- cross‑objection
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38937
36 CA3264.2026
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
36 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3264 OF 2026
IN X-OBJST/7248/2026 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 489 OF 2026
MAYUR RAVINDRA KAMBLE
VERSUS
DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER ZILLA PARISHAD LATUR
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Fayaz Khurshid Patel
...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
Date : 27.08.2026
PER COURT :-
1. Although the respondents are served, none present.
2. For the reasons stated in the application for
condonation of delay in filing the Cross-Objection, the same is
allowed.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
marathe
Checking your session…