Bombay High Court
SUNITA RADHESHYAM JAYSINGHANI AND ORSversusBHATU BHIMRAO SONAWANE AND ANR
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The court held that the civil application should be allowed.
Summary
Sunita Radheshyam Jaysinghani and others filed a civil application (No. 357 of 2024) against Bhatu Bhimrao Sonawane and others. A related first appeal (No. 1392 of 2024) was also pending, involving the Divisional Office of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Dhule as appellant. During the hearing, respondent No. 1 to 5, through counsel Mr. Dinesh P. Pande, waived service of process. The matter was expedited, and after hearing the parties, the court allowed the civil application. No further orders were recorded beyond the allowance of the application.
Subjects
- civil procedure
- service waiver
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38470
30 CA No.357.2024
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 357 OF 2024
IN FAST/38491/2023
SUNITA RADHESHYAM JAYSINGHANI AND ORS
VERSUS
BHATU BHIMRAO SONAWANE AND ANR
***
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Dipesh D. Pande
***
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1392 OF 2024
THE DIVISIONAL OFFICE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT
CORPORATION DHULE
VERSUS
SUNITA RADHESHYAM JAYSINGHANI AND ORS
***
Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D. S. Bagul
Advocate for Respondents No. 1 to 5 : Mr. Dinesh D Pande
***
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
Date : 25th August, 2026
PER COURT :-
Civil Application No. 357 of 2024
. For the reasons stated in the application, civil
application is allowed.
First Appeal No. 1392 of 2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Admit.
30 CA No.357.2024
-2-
3. Call Record and Proceedings.
4. Mr. Dinesh P. Pande waives service on behalf of
respondents No. 1 to 5.
5. Hearing expedited.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
Omkar Joshi
Checking your session…