Bombay High Court

BHAGWAT RAMCHANDRA BADAMEversusNARSINGH KASHINATH PAWAR

Disposal: APPLICATION ALLOWED

Holding

The delay of 189 days is condoned, and the appeal is to be registered.

Summary

The applicant, Bhagwat Ramchandra Badame, filed an application seeking condonation of a 189‑day delay in filing his appeal against Narsingh Kashinath Pawar. The court examined the application and heard the applicant’s counsel, Mr. Jay Veer (h/f Anjali Dube). It observed that the delay was not deliberately caused and, in the interest of justice, should be excused. Accordingly, the court condoned the delay and allowed the application, directing that the appeal be registered. The decision reflects the court’s discretion to condone procedural delays where no fault is shown.

Issues considered

Whether a delay of 189 days in filing an appeal can be condoned under the principles of natural justice and procedural law.

Subjects

condonation of delay
civil appeal
interest of justice
procedural law
high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38952

(1) 983 ca 4402.26

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD

983 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4402 OF 2026
IN SAST/9977/2026

BHAGWAT RAMCHANDRA BADAME
VERSUS
NARSINGH KASHINATH PAWAR

…..
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Jay Veer h/f. Anjali Dube
…..

CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 27.08.2026

P.C.:-

1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 189 days caused
in filing the appeal.

2. Perused the application. Heard the learned advocate for
applicant.

3. On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay has not
been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay
deserves to be condoned.

4. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands
condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice. Appeal be
registered.

[SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.]
mubashir

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…