Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KETAN HARISCHANDRA KUMAVAT AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH INDUSTRIAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court condoned the delay in the civil application but dismissed the writ petition in accordance with the earlier order.

Summary

The petitioners filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay and a writ petition challenging the State of Maharashtra. The court, after considering the civil application, condoned the delay and restored the writ petition. However, the court noted that the issues raised in the writ petition had already been addressed in an earlier order dated 09.07.2026 in Writ Petition No. 12122/2025 and related petitions. Relying on the reasoning in that earlier order, the court dismissed the writ petition. Thus, while the procedural delay was forgiven, the substantive relief sought in the writ petition was denied.

Issues considered

  • Whether the delay in filing the civil application can be condoned
  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground that its issues were already decided in an earlier order

Subjects

  • delay condonation
  • writ petition
  • civil application
  • High Court
  • precedent

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39654-DB
                                               1                            33.CA.4443.26.odt

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4443 OF 2026
                                          IN WP/5277/2026
                                                WITH
                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 5277 OF 2026

                          KETAN HARISCHANDRA KUMAVAT AND ANOTHER
                                               VERSUS
                             THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH
                               INDUSTRIAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
                                                  ...
                           Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Sunil Vishnu Salve
                             AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. N.S. Tekale
                            Advocate for Respondent No.6 : Mr. S.S. Dande
                                                  ...
                                    CORAM         : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                      ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                     DATE           : 29.08.2026

             PER COURT:

             1.        For the reasons stated in the civil application, the delay is

             condoned. The writ petition stands restored.

             2.        The issue involves in this writ petition is covered by the order

             passed by this bench on 09.07.2026 in Writ Petition No. 12122/2025

             and other connected writ petitions.

             3.        For the reasons stated in the said order, the writ petition stands

             dismissed.



             (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                     (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)


             habeeb/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.