Bombay High Court
SHANKAR APPARAO MANE (L.RS.)VITHAL AND OTHERS.versusVITHAL GYANOBA MANE AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The appeal was dismissed against respondent No.2 for not taking necessary steps, and the civil application for fixing a final hearing was allowed.
Summary
The appellant Vithal Gyanoba Mane filed a second appeal (No. 94 of 1995) and a civil application (No. 4858 of 2019) seeking a final hearing. The court noted that the required copies of documents had not been supplied for several years, leading to procedural non‑compliance. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed against respondent No.2 for failing to take the necessary steps. The appellant's counsel was absent at the hearing. The civil application filed to fix a date for the final hearing was allowed. The court listed the appeal for a final hearing on 4 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to the failure to supply required copies and procedural inaction by respondent No.2
Subjects
- civil procedure
- appeal
- final hearing
- procedural default
Judgment
sa94.95
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
17 SECOND APPEAL NO. 94 OF 1995
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4858 OF 2019
Vithal Gyanoba Mane.
VERSUS
Shankar Apparao Mane (l.rs.) Vithal And Others.
…..
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 31st AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. The copies are not supplied for years together. The appeal
is dismissed against respondent No.2 for not taking necessary steps
in the matter. Learned advocate for the appellant is absent. The civil
application No. 4858 of 2019 filed for fixing the appeal for final
hearing is allowed.
2. List the appeal for final hearing on 04.09.2026.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.)
rlj/
Checking your session…