Bombay High Court
The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Beed and OthersversusSantaram Ashruba Bhange (Died) Through L.Rs. Mangal Santram Bhange and Ors.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The Court condoned the delay of 2,345, 2,490 and 1,457 days, allowing the appeals to be admitted.
Summary
The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Project Division, Beed and others filed three applications seeking condonation of delay of 2,345, 2,490 and 1,457 days in filing their appeals. The sole respondent in each case was duly served. The Court examined the reasons set out in paragraphs 5 to 7 of the applications and found them sufficient to justify condoning the delay. Accordingly, the Court granted the condonation and ordered that the appeals be placed for admission after removal of any office objections. The applications were then disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay of 2,345, 2,490 and 1,457 days in filing the appeals can be condoned under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- civil appeal
- procedural law
- admission of appeal
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38149
1 979 CA 4987-2026, 980 & 998.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
979 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4987 OF 2026
IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 9727 OF 2026
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION PROJECT DIVISION BEED
AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
SANJIVANI W/O RAJEBHAU KADAM
AND
980 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4995 OF 2026
IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 9742 OF 2026
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION PROJECT DIVISION BEED
AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
CHANDRASEN JANARDHAN YADAV
AND
998 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4997 OF 2026
IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 9704 OF 2026
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION DIVISION BEED AND OTHERS
VERSUS
SANTARAM ASHRUBA BHANGE (DIED) THROUGH L.RS. MANGAL
SANTRAM BHANGE AND OTHERS
…
Mr. A.P. Raka h/f. Mr. S.W. Munde – Advocate for Applicants
…
CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 21.08.2026
PER COURT :
1. These applications are filed for condonation of delay of 2345, 2490
and 1457 days, respectively. The sole respondent in all the applications
has been served.
2 979 CA 4987-2026, 980 & 998.odt
2. For the reasons stated in paragraphs 5 to 7 of the respective
applications, the delay in filing the appeals is condoned. The applications
are allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’.
3. The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office
objections, if any.
4. The applications are accordingly disposed of.
[ MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. ]
Pooja Kale/
Checking your session…