Bombay High Court
SHIVAPPA HIRANAPPA @ IRANAPPA MULE DIED THR LRS KASHINATH SHIVAPPA MULEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ANR
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
Condonation of the delay is granted subject to the applicant’s undertaking not to claim statutory benefits or interest.
Summary
The applicant, Shivappa Hirnappa, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 6,347‑day delay in filing an appeal against a decree. The court examined the reasons for the delay and noted that similar appeals by other claimants had already been enhanced. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was served but did not appear. The court allowed the application on the condition that the applicant give an undertaking not to claim any statutory benefit or interest for the delayed period, to be filed with the appeal. Consequently, the civil application was disposed, the appeal was registered, and it was listed for hearing on 24‑09‑2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 6,347 days in filing an appeal can be condoned under the Civil Procedure Code
- Whether the court can condition condonation on an undertaking to forgo statutory benefits and interest
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- civil procedure
- appeal
- undertaking
- statutory benefit
- interest
- High Court
Judgment
1 1059.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5014 OF 2025
IN FAST/13202/2025
SHIVAPPA HIRANAPPA @ IRANAPPA MULE DIED THR LRS
KASHINATH SHIVAPPA MULE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. COLLECTOR
OSMANABAD AND ANR
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Patil Shashikiran N.
AGP for Respondent No. 1 : Ms. Preeti Diggikar
…
CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 03rd SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. This Application is filed for condonation of delay of 6347
days in filing the Appeal by the Claimant.
2. The reasons for delay has been explained in paragraph nos. 2
and 3.
3. It is submitted that the Appeal for enhancement by other
Claimants arising out of the same project has already been enhanced by
this Court. Respondent no. 2 though served, none appears for Respondent
no. 2.
4. Considering the explanation for delay given in Application,
the Civil Application is allowed on the condition that the Claimant shall
2 1059.odt
give an undertaking to the Registrar (Judicial) that he shall not claim any
statutory benefit and the interest for the delayed period in filing the
Appeal. The undertaking shall be placed along with the Appeal and
considered while passing the final order.
5. Civil Application stands disposed of.
6. First Appeal be registered.
7. List the Appeal on 24.09.2026.
( MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. )
SPC
Checking your session…