Bombay High Court
BHANUDAS RAMLING LONDHE DIED THR LRS TRYAMBAK BHANUDAS LONDHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ANR.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The court condoned the delay and allowed the applications, subject to an undertaking that no statutory benefits or interest will be claimed for the delayed period.
Summary
The petitioners, original claimants in a succession of civil applications, sought condonation of a 4,812‑day delay in filing appeals after the death of Bhanudas Ramling Londhe. The State of Maharashtra opposed the delay, arguing that the claimants were barred from seeking statutory benefits and interest for the period of delay. The court examined the explanation provided by the petitioners and found it satisfactory. It therefore allowed the applications on the condition that the claimants execute an undertaking not to claim any statutory benefit or interest for the delayed period within four weeks. The applications were subsequently disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 4,812 days in filing appeals can be condoned under civil procedure law
- Whether claimants may claim statutory benefits and interest for the period of delay
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- civil procedure
- statutory benefits
- interest
- High Court of Bombay
- applications disposed
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41093
1 1098.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5610 OF 2026
IN FAST/11019/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5613 OF 2026
IN FAST/11079/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5612 OF 2026
IN FAST/11083/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5611 OF 2026
IN FAST/11088/2026
BHANUDAS RAMLING LONDHE DIED THR LRS TRYAMBAK
BHANUDAS LONDHE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST
COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ANR.
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Patil Laxmikant C. (through V.C.)
AGP for Respondent/s – State : Mr. K.S. Hoke Patil
…
CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 03rd SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. In all these Applications, there is a delay of 4812 days in
filing the Appeals by the original Claimants.
2. The explanation has been satisfactorily given in the Civil
Application.
3. In view of the explanation given by the Applicant, the Civil
2 1098.odt
Applications deserve to be allowed, subject to condition that the
Claimants shall furnish an undertaking to the Registrar (Judicial) of this
Court to the effect that they will not claim any statutory benefit and
interest for the delayed period, within a period of four weeks.
4. Civil Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’.
5. Civil Applications shall stand disposed of.
( MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. )
SPC
Checking your session…