Bombay High Court
EKNATH DEVRAO LONDHE.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ANR.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The applications are allowed subject to the claimants’ undertaking not to claim any statutory benefit or interest for the delayed period.
Summary
The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Bhanudas Ramling Londhe, filed multiple civil applications seeking to condone a delay of 4,812 days in filing appeals against the State of Maharashtra. The delay spanned over thirteen years, raising the question of whether the court could entertain such belated filings. The petitioners submitted a satisfactory explanation for the delay in the accompanying civil application. The bench, after considering the explanation, held that the applications could be allowed provided the claimants executed an undertaking not to claim any statutory benefits or interest for the period of delay. Accordingly, the court allowed the applications under prayer clause ‘B’ and ordered that the claimants furnish the undertaking within four weeks. The applications were then disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 4,812 days in filing appeals can be condoned
- Whether the claimants may be permitted to claim statutory benefits and interest for the delayed period
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- civil appeals
- statutory benefits
- interest
- procedural law
- High Court of Bombay
- Aurangabad bench
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41094
1 1098.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5610 OF 2026
IN FAST/11019/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5613 OF 2026
IN FAST/11079/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5612 OF 2026
IN FAST/11083/2026
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5611 OF 2026
IN FAST/11088/2026
BHANUDAS RAMLING LONDHE DIED THR LRS TRYAMBAK
BHANUDAS LONDHE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIST
COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ANR.
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Patil Laxmikant C. (through V.C.)
AGP for Respondent/s – State : Mr. K.S. Hoke Patil
…
CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 03rd SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. In all these Applications, there is a delay of 4812 days in
filing the Appeals by the original Claimants.
2. The explanation has been satisfactorily given in the Civil
Application.
3. In view of the explanation given by the Applicant, the Civil
2 1098.odt
Applications deserve to be allowed, subject to condition that the
Claimants shall furnish an undertaking to the Registrar (Judicial) of this
Court to the effect that they will not claim any statutory benefit and
interest for the delayed period, within a period of four weeks.
4. Civil Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’.
5. Civil Applications shall stand disposed of.
( MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. )
SPC
Checking your session…