Bombay High Court
LIMBRAJ DATTATRAYA PATIL (DIED) THROUGH LEGAL REPR. MANGALBAI (DIED) THR LEGAL REPR. VAIBHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The court condoned the 2,450‑day delay, subject to an undertaking that the petitioners will not claim statutory benefits or interest for the delayed period.
Summary
The petitioners, representatives of the deceased Limbraj Dattatraya Patil and Mangalbai, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 2,450‑day delay in filing their first appeal against a decree of the State of Maharashtra. The respondents, represented by the State, were served and appeared, while one respondent did not appear. The court examined the reasons for the delay, found them satisfactorily explained, and granted condonation on the condition that the petitioners furnish an undertaking not to claim any statutory benefits or interest for the delayed period within eight weeks. The undertaking condition was imposed to prevent unjust enrichment. Consequently, the application was allowed as per prayer clause “B”.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 2,450 days in filing a first appeal can be condoned under the Civil Procedure Code
- Whether the court may condition condonation on an undertaking not to claim statutory benefits and interest
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- civil procedure
- first appeal
- statutory benefits
- interest
- undertaking
Judgment
1 1037-CA.5678-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1037 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5678 OF 2026
IN FAST/12000/2026
LIMBRAJ DATTATRAYA PATIL (DIED) THROUGH LEGAL REPR.
MANGALBAI (DIED) THR LEGAL REPR. VAIBHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR
OSMANABAD AND ORS.
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kadam Jaydeep Samadhan.
AGP for Respondent/s-State : Ms. Vaishali S. Chaudhary.
...
CORAM : MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 24.09.2026
PER COURT :-
1. This civil application is filed by the claimants. for
condonation of delay of 2450 days caused in filing the first
appeal.
2. Notice was issued in this matter and all the respondents
are served. Learned AGP appeared for the respondents/State
Authorities. Respondent No.3 though served none appears for
him.
3. Reasons for delay are satisfactorily explained in the
application. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay
of 2450 days is condoned subject to condition that the
applicants shall furnish undertaking to the Registrar (Judicial)
2 1037-CA.5678-26.odt
of this Court that they will not claim any statutory benefits and
interest for the delayed period. The undertaking shall be
furnished within a period of eight (8) weeks from today.
4. Civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “B”.
(MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J.)
...
vmk/-
Checking your session…