Bombay High Court
SURYAKANT RAMCHANDRA DEBADWAR and ORSversusLATABAI NAGNATH DEBADWAR and ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court disposed of the application as the stay of execution had already been granted.
Summary
The appellants filed a civil application (No. 580 of 2006) seeking a stay of execution of an impugned judgment and decree. The court had already granted a stay in the earlier proceedings. The appellant's counsel requested additional time, which the court allowed as a final opportunity. Upon review, the court observed that the relief sought had already been granted and there was no further matter to consider. Consequently, the application was disposed of without further order.
Issues considered
- Whether the court should grant any further relief in the application for stay of execution when a stay has already been granted?
Subjects
- stay of execution
- civil application
- appellate procedure
- judgment disposal
Judgment
912 SA NO. 23 OF 2006.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
912 SECOND APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2006
Suryakant Ramchandra Debadwar And Ors
VERSUS
Latabai Nagnath Debadwar And Ors
...
Mr. P V Mandlik, Advocate for Appellant
Mr. Kalani Pravin N., Advocate for Respondent Nos.7-1f,
Mr. G. K. Naik Thigale, Advocate for respondent Nos.1,3,4 And 6
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 580 OF 2006 IN SA/23/2006WITH
SECOND APPEAL NO. 122 OF 2006
….
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 10.09.2026
PER COURT :-
1. Learned Advocate for the Appellants seeks time.
2. As a last chance, time is granted. Stand over to
28.09.2026 at 02:30 p.m.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 580 OF 2006
1. This is an application seeking stay to the execution of
the impugned judgment and decree.
2. The stay has already been granted by this Court. In view
of the same, nothing further survives for consideration in the
present application. Hence, the application is disposed of
accordingly.
[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ]
HRJadhav 1 of 1
Checking your session…