Bombay High Court

BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THR ITS DIV. MANAGER, AURANGABAD.versusARUNABAI WD/O EKNATH SALVE AND ORS.

Disposal: Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The court allowed the applications filed by the insurer.

Summary

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., through its Aurangabad manager, filed a first appeal against Arunabai, widow of Eknath Salve, and other respondents concerning an insurance dispute. The appeal incorporated several civil applications, notably applications No. 7053 and No. 7058 of 2026. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, examined the submissions and the reasons set out in the applications. After consideration, the court found merit in the insurer's contentions. Consequently, the court allowed both applications, granting relief sought by the insurer.

Subjects

insurance
claim
high court
appeal
civil application

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38955



                                                                  28 FA473.2022+
                                             -1-

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          28 FIRST APPEAL NO. 473 OF 2022
               BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THR ITS DIV.
                              MANAGER, AURANGABAD
                                      VERSUS
                      ARUNABAI WD/O EKNATH SALVE AND ORS
                                        ...

                                         WITH
                          CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3516 OF 2022
                                    IN FA/473/2022
                                         WITH
                          CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7058 OF 2026
                                    IN FA/473/2022
                                         WITH
                          CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7053 OF 2026
                                    IN FA/473/2022

                                             …
              Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Mohit R. Deshmukh
              Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 4 : Mr. Dnyaneshwar
              Babasaheb Pawar
                                             …

                                        CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                           Date : 27.08.2026

              PER COURT :-

              1.         Heard.


              C.A.No.7053 of 2026

              2.         For the reasons stated in the application, the same is

              allowed.
                                                    28 FA473.2022+
                               -2-

C.A.No.7058 of 2026

3.         For the reasons stated in the application, the same is

allowed.




                                     (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)

marathe

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…