Bombay High Court

BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THR ITS DIV. MANAGER, AURANGABAD.versusARUNABAI WD/O EKNATH SALVE AND ORS.

Disposal: Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The High Court allowed the civil applications filed by Bajaj Allianz (applications 7053 and 7058 of 2026).

Summary

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., through its Aurangabad manager, filed a first appeal against Arunabai, widow of Eknath Salve, and other respondents concerning an insurance dispute. The appellant pursued several civil applications (Nos. 3516 of 2022, 7058 of 2026, and 7053 of 2026) seeking relief. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, examined the applications and, despite the lack of detailed reasoning in the excerpt, allowed both applications 7053 and 7058. The court’s order indicates that the relief sought by the insurer was granted. No specific statutory provisions or precedents were cited in the judgment excerpt.

Issues considered

What relief was sought by Bajaj Allianz in the civil applications?
Whether the civil applications filed by the insurer were maintainable and warranted grant of relief.

Subjects

Insurance
Claim
High Court
Appeal
Civil Application
Bajaj Allianz

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38956



                                                                  28 FA473.2022+
                                             -1-

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          28 FIRST APPEAL NO. 473 OF 2022
               BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THR ITS DIV.
                              MANAGER, AURANGABAD
                                      VERSUS
                      ARUNABAI WD/O EKNATH SALVE AND ORS
                                        ...

                                         WITH
                          CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3516 OF 2022
                                    IN FA/473/2022
                                         WITH
                          CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7058 OF 2026
                                    IN FA/473/2022
                                         WITH
                          CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7053 OF 2026
                                    IN FA/473/2022

                                             …
              Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Mohit R. Deshmukh
              Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 4 : Mr. Dnyaneshwar
              Babasaheb Pawar
                                             …

                                        CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                           Date : 27.08.2026

              PER COURT :-

              1.         Heard.


              C.A.No.7053 of 2026

              2.         For the reasons stated in the application, the same is

              allowed.
                                                    28 FA473.2022+
                               -2-

C.A.No.7058 of 2026

3.         For the reasons stated in the application, the same is

allowed.




                                     (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)

marathe

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…