Bombay High Court
SUNITA RAMNATH KANDE AND ORS.versusMANAGER, TATA MOTORS LTD., LUCKNOW AND ANR.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The court held that the petitioners are entitled to withdraw the awarded compensation, including any accrued interest.
Summary
The petitioners, who were original claimants in a motor accident compensation proceeding (MACP No. 581/2007), filed an application seeking withdrawal of the compensation awarded to them in First Appeal No. 30/2013. The appeal had been allowed on 14‑08‑2014, directing the insurer to honor the claim and to recover the amount from the vehicle owner (Respondent No. 5). The court considered the petitioners' request to withdraw the awarded amount. It allowed the withdrawal of the compensation amount, including any accrued interest, for Applicant No. 4 and permitted the other petitioners to withdraw their shares as well. Consequently, the application for withdrawal was granted.
Issues considered
- What is the court's jurisdiction to allow withdrawal of a compensation award granted in a prior appeal?
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to withdraw their awarded amounts, including interest, after the insurer has been directed to recover the sum from the vehicle owner.
Subjects
- withdrawal of compensation
- motor accident claim
- insurance liability
- civil procedure
- court order
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39549
(1) 902ca7469.26
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
902 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7469 OF 2026
IN FA/30/2013
Sunita Ramnath Kande And Ors.
.....Petitioners
VERSUS
Manager, Tata Motors Ltd., Lucknow And Anr.
.....Respondents
Mr. Shaikh Sohail Yusuf, Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. M. R. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Respondent
CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 29th AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
1. The present Application is filed by the Respondent Nos. 1
to 4 in First Appeal No. 30/2013. Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 are the
original claim Petitioners in MACP No. 581/2007 out of which said
Appeal arises. The Appeal preferred by the Appellant-insurance
company came to be allowed vide judgment and award dated 14-08-
2014. However, the Appellant-insurance company is directed to
honour the claim and recover the amount from the owner of the
vehicle i.e. Respondent No. 5 in the Appeal.
2. In view of above, the Application for withdrawal of the
amount is allowed.
1 of 2
(2) 902ca7469.26
3. Applicant No. 4 is permitted to withdraw the amount of
compensation with respect to her share along with accrued interest, if
any.
[ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. ]
VishalK/902ca7469.26
2 of 2
Checking your session…