Bombay High Court
ANKUSH PANDURANG BHALKE DIED THR LRS ALKABAI A BHALKE AND ORSversusDEUBAI PRALHAD HIWALE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court quashed any abatement and permitted the legal representatives to be incorporated as parties to the writ petition.
Summary
During the pendency of a writ petition, the sole petitioner, Ankush Pandurang Bhalke, died. His legal representatives were unaware of the proceedings and only later approached counsel, filing a civil application to continue the petition. The court examined whether the petition abated due to the petitioner's death and whether the delay in filing the application could be condoned. It held that the abatement, if any, was to be quashed and allowed the substitution of the legal representatives, condoning the delay. The registry was directed to amend the title clause to include the representatives, and interim relief was granted pending a further hearing on 22 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Does the death of the sole petitioner cause abatement of the writ petition?
- Can the delay in filing an application for substitution of legal representatives be condoned?
- May the legal representatives be permitted to continue the writ petition as parties?
Subjects
- death of petitioner
- abatement
- substitution of legal representatives
- delay condonation
- writ petition amendment
- interim relief
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38719
16-sr920.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7846 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 13925 OF 2023
Ankush Pandurang Bhalke
VERSUS
Deubai Pralhad Hiwale And Others
----
Ms.Ashwini Deshmukh, Advocate h/f. Mr.Devant Deshmukh, Advocate
for applicant
None present for the respondents
----
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATE : AUGUST 25, 2026
ORDER :-
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. None present for
the respondents.
2. The application reveals that during pendency of the Writ
Petition the sole petitioner died. His legal representatives did not
approach the learned advocate for informing about his death and
incorporating their names as legal representatives of the sole Writ
Petitioner. This resulted into delay in filing this application. The legal
representatives of the sole petitioner contend that they were not aware
about the proceedings filed before this court by the deceased sole
petitioner. No sooner did they learn about the proceedings, they
2 16-sr920
approached their learned advocate and filed the Civil Application. It
is submitted that the cause to continue the prosecution of the
petitioner survives in them after demise of the sole petitioner.
3. For the reasons recorded in the application, the
application is allowed. Delay caused in filing the application stands
condoned. Abatement if any is quashed and set aside. Registry
shall permit the applicants to incorporate their names in the title
clause of the Writ Petition as legal representatives of sole petitioner.
Amendment be carried out within two weeks.
4. List the petition for consideration on 22.09.2026. Interim
relief to continue till then.
[AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.]
………..
KBP
Checking your session…