Bombay High Court
VITHOBA SADHU KAMBLE (DIED) THR LRS DATTU AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ANR.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The court allowed the application, condoned the delay, set aside any abatement, and permitted amendment of the title clause to include the legal representatives of the deceased claimant.
Summary
The claimants filed a First Appeal seeking enhancement of compensation against the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of that appeal, claimant No.2, Nilkhant Vithoba Kamble, died, and his legal representatives (applicants Nos.2A to 2E) filed a civil application to amend the title clause of the First Appeal to include their names. The application was filed 1,610 days after the death, and the applicants explained the delay as due to lack of knowledge of the appeal's pendency. The High Court examined whether such a delayed amendment could be permitted and whether any abatement should stand. It condoned the delay, set aside any abatement, and ordered that the title clause be amended within two weeks, thereby allowing the application.
Issues considered
- Whether a civil application filed after a long delay can be entertained to amend the title clause of an appeal due to the death of a claimant.
- Whether the delay of 1,610 days can be condoned under the Civil Procedure Code.
- Whether any abatement arising from the delay should be set aside.
Subjects
- amendment of pleadings
- title clause
- legal representative
- delay condonation
- civil procedure
- compensation claim
- abatement
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41838
1
934 CA 7878 OF 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
934 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7878 OF 2026
IN FA/3665/2023
VITHOBA SADHU KAMBLE (DIED) THR LRS DATTU AND
ORS.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR,
OSMANABAD AND ANR.
...
Mr. V. V. Ingale, Advocate for Applicants
Mr. A. V. Lavte, AGP for Respondent-State
…
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 8th September 2026
P.C. :-
. The First Appeal is filed by the claimants seeking
enhancement in the compensation. It is informed that during
the pendency of the First Appeal, claimant No.2–Nilkhant
Vithoba Kamble died. The applicant Nos.2A to 2E are the legal
representatives of the deceased claimant–Nilkhant Vithoba
Kamble. The present Civil Application is filed seeking
permission to amend the title clause of the First Appeal and
the applications therein, if any, by incorporating the names of
the applicant Nos.2A to 2E as the legal representatives of the
deceased claimant.
2
934 CA 7878 OF 2026
2. There is a delay of 1610 days in filing the present Civil
Application. The reasons for the delay are explained in the
application. It is stated that for want of knowledge about the
pendency of the First Appeal, the present application could
not be filed earlier.
3. For the reasons stated in the application, the Civil
Application is allowed. The delay caused in filing the
application stands condoned. The abatement, if any, is set
aside.
4. The applicants are permitted to amend the title clause
of the First Appeal and the applications therein, if any, by
incorporating their names as the legal representatives of
deceased claimant–Nilkhant Vithoba Kamble.
5. Amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks
from today.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
PRW
Checking your session…