Bombay High Court
ANJANABAI TUKARAM PAWAR (DIED) LRS MITRAVANDABAI (DIED) THR LRS GUNABAI (DIED) LRS HARIDAS AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, LATUR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The order dismissing the First Appeal is quashed and the appeal is restored, subject to removal of office objections within four weeks.
Summary
The applicants filed a petition seeking restoration of a First Appeal that had been dismissed because they failed to remove office objections within the prescribed time. They argued that the dismissal resulted from an oversight that prevented the matter from being noticed. The Court condoned any delay in filing the restoration application and quashed the order dated 04.01.2022 that dismissed the appeal. The First Appeal was restored, subject to the condition that the appellant remove all office objections within four weeks, failing which the order would lapse automatically. The decision effectively reinstates the appeal and imposes a clear deadline for compliance.
Issues considered
- Whether the order dismissing the First Appeal for failure to remove office objections can be set aside.
- Whether the delay in filing the restoration application can be condoned.
Subjects
- restoration of appeal
- quashing order
- condonation of delay
- office objections
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42220
1
915 CA 7881 OF 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7881 OF 2022
IN FAST/33259/2019
ANJANABAI TUKARAM PAWAR (DIED) LRS
MITRAVANDABAI (DIED) THR LRS GUNABAI (DIED) LRS
HARIDAS AND ORS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR,
LATUR AND OTHERS
...
Mr. R. K. Ashtekar, Advocate for Applicants
Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGP for Respondent-State
…
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 11th September 2026
P.C. :-
. Heard Mr. R. K. Ashtekar, learned Advocate for the
applicants.
2. The learned Advocate for the applicants submits that
the registration of the First Appeal was refused on account of
failure of the appellant to remove office objections within the
stipulated time. The present application is filed seeking
restoration of the First Appeal by quashing and setting aside
the said order of dismissal. He further submits that due to an
oversight, the matter could not be noticed which resulted in
2
915 CA 7881 OF 2022
the order of dismissal.
3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. The delay, if any, caused in filing the application
stands condoned.
4. The order dated 04.01.2022 passed by the learned
Registrar (Judicial) of this Court is hereby quashed and set
aside.
5. The First Appeal is restored to its original position,
provided that the appellant shall remove all office objections
within a period of four weeks from today.
6. It is made clear that if the office objections are not
removed within the stipulated period, this order shall
automatically lose its effect.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
PRW
Checking your session…