Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BHIKAN RASOOL TAMBOLI DIED THR LRS RAZIYA B TAMBOLI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORD AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court allowed the application, permitting the applicants to intervene in the writ petition and to file an affidavit within three weeks.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered an application filed by the legal heirs of the deceased Bhikan Rasool Tamboli seeking permission to intervene in an existing writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The court examined whether the applicants could be allowed to join the proceedings and file a reply affidavit. Relying on the merits of the application, the judges permitted the intervention and granted liberty to file an affidavit within three weeks. The order was made pursuant to prayer clause ‘B’ of the application. No substantive discussion of the underlying writ petition was provided in the excerpt.

Issues considered

  • Whether the legal heirs of the deceased may be permitted to intervene in the writ petition.
  • Whether the applicants may be granted liberty to file a reply affidavit within a specified time.

Subjects

  • intervention
  • writ petition
  • affidavit
  • civil procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:40584-DB


                                                   {1}                   25.1-ca-8145-2026

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                            BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                     CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8145 OF 2026
                                               IN WP/3554/2024

              Bhikan Rasool Tamboli Died Through legal heirs Raziya Bhikan Tamboli
                                              And Others
                                                VERSUS
                                The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                                                   ...
              Mr. G.R. Syed, Advocate for Applicants
              Mr. N.D Batule, AGP for State
              Mr. V.B. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner in writ petition
              Mr. S.S. Varma and Mr. S.S. Ladda, Advocate for Respondent No. 7
              Mr. N.U. Yadav, Advocate for Respondent No. 6
                                                 .......

                                          CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                  ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                             DATE : 04th SEPTEMBER, 2026
              PER COURT :

              1.       Heard.

              2.       For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed in

              terms of prayer clause ‘B’.

              3.       Applicants are permitted to intervene in the writ petition.

              4.       Applicants are at liberty to file affidavit in reply to the writ

              petition within three weeks from today.



              (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                   (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)

              Bhagyawant Punde


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.