Bombay High Court
SHAIKH ISMAIL SHAIKH MOHAMMAD DIED THR LRS SHAIKH FATTE MOHAMMAD ISMAIL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court condoned the delay and allowed the amendment to add the legal representatives of the deceased respondent.
Summary
The petitioners sought to amend the writ petition to add the legal representatives of a deceased respondent (respondent no.7) after learning of his death during the pendency of the case. They explained a 306‑day delay in filing the amendment application, attributing it to the time taken to ascertain the heirs' identities. The respondents objected on the ground of delay. The Court, after considering the explanation, exercised its discretion to condone the delay and permitted the amendment to include respondents 7A to 7G as legal representatives, directing that notice be issued to them within two weeks and that the matter be returnable on 16‑09‑2026, with interim relief to continue. The order thus allows the amendment and condones the procedural delay.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay of 306 days in filing the amendment application can be condoned
- Whether the petitioners may be permitted to amend the title clause to add legal representatives of a deceased respondent
- Whether notice should be issued to the newly added respondents
Subjects
- civil procedure
- condonation of delay
- amendment of pleadings
- legal representatives of deceased
- notice issuance
Judgment
9-sr914.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 816 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 11416 OF 2024
Shaikh Ismail Shaikh Mohammad (Died)
Through Lrs Shaikh Fatte Mohammad Ismail And Others
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr.P.S.Dighe h/f. Mr. Dhorde Vikram R
AGP for Respondents 1 to 5: Mr.S.P.Sonpavale
Advocate for Respondent no.6 : Ms.Nikita Lad hf. Mr.N.E.Deshmukh
...
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATE : AUGUST 20, 2026
ORDER :-
Mr.Dighe, learned advocate h/f. Mr.V.R.Dhorde, learned
Advocate for the applicants submits that during pendency of the
petition it is learnt that respondent no.7 is no more. Hence, after
ascertaining the information about the legal representatives of
deceased respondent no.7, this Civil Application is filed. There is delay
of 306 days caused in filing this application. He submits that the
applicant/petitioner had no knowledge of respondent no.7’s death and
also his legal representatives. Hence, some time is spent in collecting
such information whereby delay has occurred. He would submit that
delay may be condoned and the petitioner be permitted amend the
2 9-sr914
title clause accordingly. He further submits that notice may also be
issued to the newly added respondents.
2. Learned advocates appearing for the other side object
the application, on the ground of delay
3. Considering the reasons given in the application, I deem
it appropriate to allow the Civil Application. The same stands
allowed. Delay caused in filing the Civil Application is condoned.
4. The applicant/petitioner is permitted to add the names of
respondent nos.7A to 7G as legal representatives of deceased
respondent no.7. Amendment be carried out within two weeks from
today. Upon carrying out amendment, issue notice to the added
respondents, returnable on 16.09.2026.
5. Interim relief to continue till then.
[AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.]
………..
KBP
Checking your session…