Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ROHIT DIVAKAR PAWAR.versusGAJANAN BHARATRAO KULKARNI AND ANR.

Disposal
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The court allowed the civil application as prayed for in clause A.

Summary

Rohit Divakar Pawar filed a civil application before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, against Gajanan Bharat Rao Kulkarni and another respondent. The applicant was represented by Mr. Ashutosh S. Kulkarni, while the second respondent was represented by Mr. Swapnil S. Rathi. The matter was heard by Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh on 21 August 2026. After considering the pleadings, the court found merit in the applicant’s prayer and ordered relief as specified in prayer clause “A”. Consequently, the civil application was allowed in its entirety.

Judgment

                                   1                     25-CA-8238-26.odt




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD


      CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8238 OF 2026 IN FAST/20136/2018

                      ROHIT DIVAKAR PAWAR
                             VERSUS
          GAJANAN BHARATRAO KULKARNI AND ANOTHER
                                ...
         Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ashutosh S. Kulkarni
        Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Swapnil S. Rathi
                                ...

                            CORAM :        SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                            DATE       :   21-08-2026
PER COURT:-

1.     For the reasons stated in the application, the civil application

is allowed in terms of prayer clause “A”.




                                   [SACHIN S. DESHMUKH]
                                           JUDGE

rrd


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.