Bombay High Court
M.S.E.B.JALGAONversusBABULAL JAIRAM THAKRE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The appeal is dismissed as the controversy is identical to that decided in FA No. 496/2002, and the matter is disposed of per that judgment.
Summary
The appellant, M.S.E.B. Jalgaon, appealed against a 1998 judgment and award concerning land acquisition for the Deepnagar Thermal Power Station, arguing that the dispute is identical to that decided in First Appeal No. 496/2002 (Maharashtra State Electricity Board v. Parwatibai Vedu Pawar & Ors.). The respondent/State did not appear. The Court accepted the submission that the controversy was the same as the earlier case and therefore dismissed the appeal without costs, also disposing of any pending civil application.
Issues considered
- Whether the present appeal can be decided by reference to a prior judgment on identical facts (issue estoppel/res judicata).
- Whether the coordinate bench's decision in FA No. 496/2002 is binding on the present appeal.
Subjects
- land acquisition
- res judicata
- issue estoppel
- appeal dismissed
- coordinate bench
- Deepnagar Thermal Power Station
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38590
FA 2445/08
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
60 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2445 OF 2008
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 843 OF 2003 IN FA/2445/2008
M.S.E.B. JALGAON
VERSUS
BABULAL JAIRAM THAKARE AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.M. Gaikwad
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.N. Morampalle
...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
Dated : August 24, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties.
2. By the present appeal, the appellant/acquiring body assails the
judgment and award dated 21.4.1998 passed by the learned Jt. Civil Judge,
Senior Division at Jalgaon in LAR No. 30/1993.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant/acquiring body and the
learned AGP for State tendered across the Bar a copy of the judgment and
order dated 27.2.2026 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in FA
No. 496/2002 (Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Parwatibai Vedu
Pawar and Ors.) and other connected matters. He submits that the land of
the present appellant was acquired from the same village, for the same
purpose i.e. Deepnagar Thermal Power Station, and under the very same
notification as involved in FA No. 496/2002 (supra). It is, therefore,
contended that the controversy involved in the present appeal is squarely
covered by the judgment and order in FA No. 496/2002 (supra) and
FA 2445/08
2
consequently, the present appeal deserves to be disposed of in terms
thereof.
4. Though served, none appears for respondent/original claimants.
5. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel
for the respective parties, and in view of the admitted position that the
controversy involved in the present appeal is identical to the one decided by
the Coordinate Bench in First Appeal No.496/2002 (supra), I see no reason
to take a different view. The present appeal, therefore, deserves to be
disposed of in terms of the said judgment and order. Hence, the following
order:
ORDER
(i) The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(ii) Pending civil application, if any, stands disposed of.
( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. )
ssc/
Checking your session…