Bombay High Court
SUMAN TRIMBAK DOLEversusBHAUSAHEB SAKARAM KHILARI AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The 19‑day delay in filing the civil application is condoned and the order dismissing the writ petition is recalled.
Summary
The petitioner’s writ petition was dismissed because the court’s earlier order directing service of notice to respondents was not complied with. The petitioner filed a civil application seeking recall of that dismissal, but did so 19 days late. The court examined whether the delay in filing the civil application could be condoned and whether the earlier dismissal order could be recalled. It accepted the petitioner’s undertaking to provide correct addresses for the unserved respondents within four weeks and condoned the 19‑day delay, thereby restoring the writ petition to its original position and recalling the dismissal order. The court directed that, upon receipt of the correct addresses, notice be issued to the respondents, with a return date of 25‑08‑2026, and then disposed of the civil application.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 19 days in filing a civil application seeking recall of a dismissal order can be condoned.
- Whether the court can recall its earlier order dismissing the writ petition on account of non‑service of notice.
Subjects
- civil procedure
- writ petition
- recall of order
- condonation of delay
- service of notice
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:35279
(1) 936 CA 8475 OF 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
936 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8475 OF 2026
IN WP/1154/2024
SUMAN TRIMBAK DOLE
VERSUS
BHAUSAHEB SAKARAM KHILARI AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Tushar Kale h/f. Mr. S. R. Andhale, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. S. S. Kotkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1
…
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATE : 11.08.2026
PER COURT :-
. Heard. The writ petition came to be dismissed for want of taking
appropriate steps as directed by this Court vide order dated 30.04.2026. The
present Civil Application is filed seeking recall of the said order. There is delay
of 19 days in filing the Civil Application. The petitioner undertakes to supply
the correct addresses of the unserved respondents within a period of four
weeks from today or to take appropriate steps to serve the unserved
respondents within the said period. The undertaking is accepted.
2. The delay of 19 days caused in filing the Civil Application stands
condoned. The Writ Petition stands restored to its original position to the
extent that the directions in order dated 30.04.2026 dismissing the petition
(2) 936 CA 8475 OF 2026
stand recalled.
3. If fresh/correct addresses are supplied by the petitioner in the
given time, office to issue notice to the unserved respondents, returnable on
25.08.2026.
4. Civil Application stands disposed of.
[AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.]
PRW
Checking your session…